Maybe I’m the only one who remembers thalidomide? That one example created really weird pregnancies. There has to be a way to handle severe cases. And what do you call the mis-carriages and still births that result from the clotshots. The end result would seem to be the same as an abortion?
Decades ago we used to give blood tests to make sure a couple was compatible to minimize birth defects. We don’t seem to do that anymore? Maybe that’s one reason birth defects are up?
I’ve visited institutions where severely disabled babies are kept alive, mostly for study. To me it seems one should be careful trying to make absolutes——because stuff happens.
I had my first birth child at 45. They did a blood test to check for whatever and told me the baby had a 70% chance that he would be born with Down syndrome. I had him anyway and he was perfectly normal and is now 31 years old and my most wonderful blessing.
So we legalize all murder, if we can show that “stuff happens”?
Mis-carriages and stillbirths are not in any way related to abolitionist legislation. That is a really bad red herring.
Your reply reads just like a hard-leftist “but what about oopsie?” - which is precisely the grounds long used for abortion.