Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: buwaya

and maybe the report here isn’t fact. I discount it because of the channel reporting it and because there is a lot of made up lies about what is going on. So I believe non of it, especially since I don’t care whether or not it is true. We don’t have a vital national interest at stake here.


58 posted on 06/03/2024 5:40:17 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: AndyJackson

I showed you guys the same report re the Russian-Chinese negotiations from a trade journal - “Offshore Technology” an oil and gas journal. I like trade journals, their audience (engineers and managers) is not looking for political endorphin hits, nor are their publishers trying to make political points.

https://www.offshore-technology.com/news/russia-china-gas-pipeline-talks/

You can search more and find the same from other sources.

I suggest you all follow up specifics in reports you doubt. I have found in most cases that specifics are normally not wrong, it is the context in which they are placed and how the piece is “spun”.

There is of course the uncommon case where the facts are wrong. Its much more common in wartime from official sources. But if you find one its a bit of a coup.


62 posted on 06/03/2024 6:58:56 PM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson