Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/31/2024 9:33:40 AM PDT by definitelynotaliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: definitelynotaliberal
Fat Ass Bragggg.

2 posted on 05/31/2024 9:44:54 AM PDT by budj (Combat vet, second of three generations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: definitelynotaliberal

Bragg is a hero today, for the democrats, because he did what the Washington democrats failed to do, and that is, to find Trump guilty of something.

No democrat had been as bold as Bragg, and today they’re all celebrating the guilty verdict on Trump. That verdict may not last long after the appeals processes are done, but, Bragg has a right to brag, and so do democrats. Republicans would never do anything as crazy and radical as going after a former president, and democrats count on it. Trump had a chance for going after Hillary, and he decided against it, so, when it come to crazy and radical lawfare, democrats will always have the advantage. Republicans will always be the adults and the ‘good guys’ when it comes to political fighting, but then, that’s giving huge advantage to democrats, who will use that advantage to always get their ways. Good guys finish last.


3 posted on 05/31/2024 9:50:33 AM PDT by adorno (CCH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: definitelynotaliberal

“convoluted and weak”

Well it was nothing compared to the Grand Inquisitor’s jury “instructions”.

Just convict him of any crime, pick one - and staple it to the accounting label allegation and Voila! You izza fell-on.

We the Americans fought the damn Spanish for hundreds of years and defeated them twice outright: 1848 and 1898. Now they stream in and bring their inverted illogic with them.


4 posted on 05/31/2024 9:52:54 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: definitelynotaliberal

twice impeached convicted felon. Hmmm, is anyone still saying this isn’t political lawfare by corrupt dems?


5 posted on 05/31/2024 9:56:06 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: definitelynotaliberal

“This conviction just secured Donald Trump being our 47th President.”

-Joe Concha
FOX News


8 posted on 05/31/2024 10:14:10 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Are you ready for Black Lives MAGA? It's coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: definitelynotaliberal

“Democracy”, to the Democrat Party, means “perpetual one-party rule by the Democrat Party by forced imposition of Marxist and Maoist policies, with periodic sham elections to maintain a charade of legitimacy, while positions of power are always determined behind the scenes and the ‘elected’ are merely foot-soldiers to take the heat and do the dirty work.”


12 posted on 05/31/2024 10:25:28 AM PDT by motor_racer ("Show me the man and I'll show you the crime" - Lavrentiy Beria, J. Stalin Deputy Premier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: definitelynotaliberal

Fat Albert in NYC???
It would be wise for this thing to be looking over its shoulder even when it sleeps.
There’s this certain thing called NYC “karma” that kinda floats around there quite often.


14 posted on 05/31/2024 10:37:37 AM PDT by lgjhn23 ("On the 8th day, Satan created the progressive liberal to destroy all the good that God created..." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: definitelynotaliberal

If I Weber see that fat slob I will have something to say to him.
Of course I doubt he can go out in public very much now.


15 posted on 05/31/2024 10:43:00 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: definitelynotaliberal

Cohen said that he billed the payment as legal services. Unless you believe he was lying about that, that means that they recorded as legal fees payments they believed to be legal fees.

Why wasn’t Trump’s accountant Weisselberg called? He’s already in prison. It would be easy to get him to testify. What would he have said that they didn’t want the jurors to hear?

If, as the cult alleges, the underlying crime was illegal election payments, then why did Merchan disallow testimony from a leading expert on election law, a former chairman of the FEC? Obviously, because he would have testified that (for at lest two reasons) Trump’s payments were not illegal under the campaign law Bragg was misusing.

And the jurors were doxxed. a dangerous, if imlicit, threat.

Even David Boies said the prosecution was questionable, along with Dershowitz, Turley, McCarthy and other credible, nonpartisan legal experts.

But the Democrat cult is so blinded by their objective HATE for the man that they’ve been trying to do this since he came down that escalator.

Plenty of reversible error (or deliberate error) here. But the Democult is acting like it’s party time. Shameful. #TheyCallItCompassion


17 posted on 05/31/2024 11:51:31 AM PDT by TBP (Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Biden regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson