Replies

The truth is getting outed about the shots but still there are those who have not heard or won't listen. Sound familiar?

https://brownstone.org/articles/hydroxychloroquine-hcq/

BROWNSTONE » BROWNSTONE INSTITUTE ARTICLES » HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE (HCQ)

[The following is a chapter of Lori Weintz’s book, Mechanisms of Harm:

Medicine in the Time of Covid-19.]

Fauci, back in April of 2020 couldn’t just ignore HCQ, despite his preference for the profitable remdesivir – not with all that “buzz on the internet.” “The buzz” most likely had to do with doctors who were having success treating Covid patients with hydroxychloroquine.

Plus on March 28, 2020 the FDA had given HCQ Emergency Use Authorization to treat Covid. It was important to appear that HCQ was given a serious chance, but the study the NIH put together was a half-hearted attempt at best, and designed to fail at worst.

NIH “study” says HCQ not effective in Covid-19, increases mortality:

In April 2020 the NIH did a short retrospective study on HCQ, meaning they analyzed the records of a couple hundred men over age 65 in VA hospitals, and found “no evidence that use of hydroxychloroquine, either with or without azithromycin, reduced the risk of mechanical ventilation in patients hospitalized with Covid-19.” The analysis also concluded that overall mortality increased in patients treated with HCQ.

What the NIH Veterans Administration study failed to point out is that HCQ is most effective at onset of symptoms during the viral replication stage, not when a Covid patient is ill enough to be hospitalized and in the inflammation stage of the disease.

An Associated Press article published when the VA report was released on April 21, 2020 stated, “The drug (HCQ) has long been known to have potentially serious side effects, including altering the heartbeat in a way that could lead to sudden death.”

Someone was feeding the media misleading information about HCQ. It was well known that HCQ would only impact the heart in an adverse manner if given in too high doses, based on its decades’ long safety profile. Also, there were multiple real-world examples that countered the NIH “study.” .......................

This brilliant piece by Lori Weintz shows how when the deep states goal of killing much of the population is interrupted they will do exactly what they are doing to Pres. Trump. They lie their asses off until they kill the good guy. In this case the good guy was ivermectin and HCQ. They tried their best to kill the good drugs but just like Trump its all backfiring on them.

....................

Heres the pres. in the Bronx,no matter what they do to him he wont give up:

back in the day, I did a deep dive on the NIH report and the VA Report.
---

I’m guessing no one looked at the actual report.

It’s a study, not a clinical trial, hence it’s anecdotal.

(As an example, “Dr. Vladimir Zelenko says he has now treated (Updated at the time) - ~~699 coronavirus patients with 100% success~~ 1,450 patients with CV19 and all but 2 have been successful!!
using Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate, Zinc, and Z-Pak”)
is also anecdotal except it’s concurrent, not retrospective. and this doctor had a higher number of cases.

So what does the headline “Largest yet survey...” actually mean?

The VA study was retrospective. The data for the study was mined post-action.

Patients age range is 59-75 with a median age = 66. All patients in the study were male. 17 infected female patients were not included in the study.

Interestingly, an overwhelming majority, 236 of 368 male patients, were black - this is a current identified nationwide trend.

Neither zinc or the z-pack was administered in any of these cases...so what was the actual dosage? and frequency?

of the 368:

248 had diabetes.
7 had cancer
9 had HIV
92 had renal disease
72 had COPD
18 previously had heart attacks.
85 had congestive heart failure
8 were paraplegic\hemiplegic
Nothing indicates these are unique, so 1 person could have all the under-lying conditions.

There were 70 deaths and no mention of deaths by race.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.16.20065920v1.full.pdf

and so it goes...

P.S. I did a follow up
The VA’s case pull index date range is 03/09/2020-04/11/2020.

Something is not quite right with this study.

There were only 731 COVID cases identified in the U.S. on 03/08/2020.
https://covidtracking.com/data/us-daily

Why was the VA using hydroxychloroquine on 03/09/2020?
Hydroxychloroquine was at most an FDA “compassionate use” drug at that time.

Makes we wonder if this study actually shows just the opposite?
that more of these Vets lived or lived longer because of Hydroxychloroquine?

I would have liked to see exactly when these 368 went into the hospital with what symptoms.