I'm not an attorney, but I made a good living using a little common sense.
Here's my take(s):
* The transcript was hacked/edited, as recently admitted in open meetings. It was not as accurate as we were led to believe. So WE NEED THE AUDIO.
* Based on how Brandon answers Hur's questions, Hur determines that Brandon indeed broke the law, but he is a 'sympathetic old man with a bad memory' and cannot stand trial. Well, we need to hear what Hur heard to understand Hur's conclusion.
* The interview content (which led to the transcript and is recorded) had to do with the CRIMES Brandon committee as a Senator, Vice President, and private citizen. The content had everything to do with the abuse of classified materials used as the basis of a book whereby Brandon got an $8M advance.
* Since the content of the interview had little to do with Brandon's activities and crimes while he was a sitting President, under what rules can Executive Privilege be used to shield us from hearing the content, raw, unredacted, unedited?
* Is the 'fear of others taking the content and creating a Deep Fake a new Executive Privilege exemption? All you'd have to do is compare the real recording against a hacked Deep Fake recording and it's resolved.
Yah. Besides, we’re counting on SpaceForce being more than a high fly kite.