How to make a FREE ENERGY generator with CAR ALTERNATOR and a MOTOR (youtube.com)
Amazing 10Kw infinite energy generator! - Single and Three Phase 230V (youtube.com)
https://www.youtube.com/@TheCrazyChannelOficial https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwEwfpSf8Ho&t=232 s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiYtJfJHgjE&t=11s https://www.youtube.com/@HiddenTechnology_ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ5RO8E6z6Q&t=12s
*
Oh yeah, I saw this video...
Instead of insulting you, I’ll give you the science behind it.
Yes, it will work, but only as long as the copper brushings and the magnetism lasts. The magnets in the dynamo will start de-gaussing after a time; faster under heavy loads. In that machine, the kinetic energy being produced comes from the potential energy in the magnets themselves.
There are many types of perpetual motion machines, but they all require something in common - fuel. Hydroelectric power plants are as close as you’re going to get, with the perpetual fuel being gravity itself (so long as the river doesn’t run dry).
But if you want free energy, look into the electrolysis of water (H2O). Separating the oxygen from the hydrogen then using the later as fuel can and should be the future, so long as there is an economical means of separating the 2 elements. As we know, most of the earth is water, and we’re not running out of that any time soon.
Hope that helps.
just my $0.02
jimjohn
Whomever is generating interest in this should take out a HUGE insurance policy on themselves. Going up against the big guys shortens lifespans.
I just don’t understand why anyone buys into these ideas.
Every part of the design has efficiency loses. From air movement to wire resistance. It can’t output more energy than it consumes without a fuel source.
What is the fuel being used?
One thing is certain- if a free energy machine is ever developed, a hot glue gun will be used to build it.
Maybe I will finally stop getting calls from the solar companies.
Now how do I get rid of the extended auto warranty companies.
So why hasn’t it been made commercially available by someone? Anyone?
I have a pet unicorn and it is real. LOL
Thanks for the hilarious entertainment bert!
I was dazzled by this inventors brilliance!
Not only did he find a way to defy the laws of the universe but he also managed to run brushed dc motors from an ac wall wart connected in reverse. How could he do such magic???
(I really really really hope a sarcasm tag isn’t necessary.)
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention he has a battery (DC power) inside the fake power strip.
Bump for later
I forgot to mention that most of these “free energy” systems that drive 120 volt AC lights and motors use a car alternator. This in itself makes it a physical impossibility. The way a car alternator works is that it is essentially an AC generator that converts the power it generates to DC current. You lose power just doing that conversion. And, if you are going to convert that DC power back to AC power to run 120v devices, you will lose another 10 percent or so with that conversion also.
I have already designed a free energy generator and started assembling it in my garage. It runs by turning two opposing disks of unipole magnets, one disk negative, one disk positive. It rotates on levitating axles powered by the coriolis effect of the earth’s rotation. The electricity generated is transferred via room temperature superconducting metallic hydrogen bus bars and is stored in an alternating current, (AC) salt water xenon hydride batteries. I just need a massive government grant to finish.
Am I to understand that, to save his contemptible life sell his bogus tech, he dared to practice on our credulous simplicity?
From the vanity post link:
Quote: “By repurposing the dynamo’s coil and wiring it to a battery, you can create a magnetic generator that produces continuous 220V power.”
Wired to a battery— to run the coil of the dynamo/magneto.... “continuous” power for as long as the battery lasts. When drained... it’s over with.
An “outside source of energy” within the system, which also loses energy within the moving parts.
This is this asian/indonesian guy with the glue gun— who is actually quite good at producing more efficient mouse traps— using a system known to American country/rural/mountain folk: the water bucket baited rolling bar with climbing ramps. Kills dozens a night mice— rats bigger tend to fill the bucket up to where they can jump out and not drown.
” A generator has been created that produces the electric wattage to drive an electric motor that causes the rotor of the generator to spin and produce the electric current. Not only does the generator produce the power to run the motor, but it produces a considerable excess for other electric devices. The generator produces free energy, forever.”
I first thought of this when I started Engineering at a university. I was quickly informed by many folks that ideas for perpetual motion machines are perpetually wrong.
Please tell us you are pulling our leg. This is so obviously stupid and fake. “Car dynamo” no, it is an 12v RV water pump motor. And the little dc motor with the timing belt gear is just being spun by batteries in the wall wart. 207”volts” of what? I don’t know that meter model but let’s pretend it works and it indeed read “207 volts. Let’s assume AC. A simple battery powered inverter can easily be hidden in that power strip to get that reading. Open up the cases of the power tools and hide a battery in there with a few cheap motors to make it spin and all the plug does is close the circuit. Obviously the guy has access to a bunch of old power tools and motors. Probably has a repair shop and likes to play around in his spare time as an electrical “magician” to entertain and baffle the villagers.
Notice he never unplugs the feeder plug? Because if he did the power tools would keep running. It is producing noting. It is just completing the circuit to the small motor run by the batteries (maybe kicking on a transistor or relay). All the magnets are doing is providing enough force to overpower the torque of the smaller electrical motor hence he gives it the little push ( like what a starter relay does in any AC motor).
You gotta be joking us, right?
Who is John Galt?
Nice Rube Goldberg device. Love it!
Come to think of it, we had the exact thing you describe (not that I would bother to watch a youTube video on a perpetual motion machine topic) back in the 1950s in Electrical Engineering Lab. It was called a “motor-generator set,” and it was, at the time, of some utility only because transistors could not then be economically made (if at all) which would convert significant power wattage from AC to DC or vice versa.The machines in that lab were not new, must’ve been around for a decade or so by the time I saw them. The conceit that a simple pair of such machines could generate positive net power output ex nihilo - and that only now, human generations after I saw them, has thought to try it and succeeded strains credulity far past the breaking point. In reality the torque required to turn the generator will inevitably exceed the torque produced by the motor which turns the generator at any nonzero RPM.
You could start your system - at any RPM you choose - from an external power source, with the generator electrically disconnected) and that system would continue to rotate, accomplishing nothing but not slowing down, after you disconnect the the external power source. Also neglecting friction, if you adjust the voltage output of the generator to equal the back emf (electromagnetic force) of the the motor at the given RPM, you could connect the generator electrically to the motor and the system would continue at the same RPM. But no current would flow. The instant you put a load (say, a toaster) in parallel with the generator to produce actual output power, the torque required to turn the generator at that RPM would exceed the torque output of the motor - and the RPM of the system declines exponentially towards zero.
Theoretically never reaching zero, not that you could tell the difference.
Cranking an electric generator is work, which promoters of schemes to us an electric motor to turn an electric generator as a way to create energy want to gloss over.
There are ways to collect energy and make it available to do work all around us. “The fusion reactor in the sky,” as Elon Musk describes the sun, is the prime example. There is also geothermal heat, which is mostly “too hard” to economically access. Wind. Tides. Hydro.
The thing to understand is Moore’s Law - which accurately predicts progress as a function, not of time, but of the logarithm of the total quantity which has been produced.
In my lifetime solar panels started out as so inefficient and expensive as to be worthless for any earthbound application. But in space, all you had was sunlight (or nuclear power), and so solar panels were made in (relative to today) trivial quantities to power satellites. But precisely because the past quantities made was so low back then, it didn’t take a whole lot of utility discovery to create enough demand to induce the production of double the quantity ever made in the past. That process has continued to accelerate the quantity which has been produced and, concommitantly as Moore’s Law would predict, each doubling of production has produced the learning and the investment in economies of scale to reduce the cost of a given quantity of kilowatts worth of solar panel by a constant percentage.
And what with laptops and cell phones and, lately, electric cars, the quantity of production of rechargeable batteries has been following a similar path.
The upshot is that solar panels combined with rechargeable batteries are getting so cheap and so good that fantasies of perpetual motion machines are moot. And we wouldn’t need to pave a major state with solar panels to get all the electricity we need.
But AI supercomputers are coming - and we’re gonna need all AI’s smarts to figure out how to power them and dispose of the heat they’ll dissipate.
Any voltage through an inductor creates counter-EMF. Any current through an electric conductor creates a magnetic field which induces a current in opposition to the initial current.