Posted on 05/22/2024 4:19:02 PM PDT by grundle
The two photos have the exact same face superimposed over the body.
Yes we have cooperated some with the Russians but not much during that time frame. Can you give me some sources for your claim they were in on the con?
Sorry, but, not really.
What I SEEM to see is a bullet artificially and strategically placed at what appears to be an exit wound (could not have happened) but I’m not certain and I’m not a doctor, which is why I asked the question.
Read page 4 of the deposition of Dr Paul Peters who was one of the doctors in the ER in the Warren Commission. He clearly states there was a large occipital (back of the head) wound which was judged to be mortal. Could only come from a frontal entry/rear exit.
Huh?
You’re the person who pontificates on topics of which you know less than nothing. I’ll continue to laugh at you.
Not nearly as much as a few dedicated propagandists with Fed buck backing them can do.
Oh yes there is. I have seen it. Have you? They usually stop before Zapruder pans there, but when they had the special exhibition of all the films taken that day in Dealey Plaza “En toto” you get a look behind the fence. It was on the 7th floor of the Book Depository. Did not know they have 7 floors? I had a banquet there one time, and went to the exhibition mentioned above.
No, ever been there? It is not a head on shot from the grassy knoll. I have been there 20 times.
And there is a group of experts from Australia that duplicated the shot. The very first time they tried it from a perch with the correct height. I have been in the window next to it. It is not that much as a deflection.
And no one says they heard a very loud rifle report from behind them. Ever been in front of a rifle shot that passes over or to the side of you. It is very LOUD!
Same exact head pasted onto two different photos.
https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth337200/m1/1/
It just stands to reason.
You could read between the lines here. Russia thought the idea was worth spending some money on, but they had lots of domestic problems more important.
If they called us out how would it benefit them?
P.S. I think we did land unmanned craft on the moon and dropped some payloads too
We still use lots of vintage soviet rocket engines to launch our payloads into space
The RD-180 used in the Atlas V first stage is not "vintage" but new production. There is a company that was building boosters with vintage engines left over from the Soviet lunar program. They tended to blow up. Those are the only American rockets using Russian hardware. The rationale for buying the RD'180 was to keep the Rusdian rocket engineers from going to work for North Korea or other bad actors.
Until Musk we had very little capability.
No, all we had was the Shuttle, Titan III, Titan IV, Delta II, III, and IV, Atlas in various versions, etc. The Shuttle by itself lofted most of the ISS.
Good Job...
You sorted everyone out and proved it was ‘A Lone Nut!’
.
/$
Yep, truth doesn't matter anymore anyway. I will be gone long before truth comes out of Washington.
No, but what I responded to does not have a bit of evidence to back up their assertion. I believe in facts and they have not presented any. DO you have any facts you care to bring out?
Hubby’s reading this book, now, and is really liking it ... all of the details/back up.
Yes, it is Oswald’s head. OK, now what?
Agree.
Oswald said he was a patsy and that he didn’t shoot JFK.
BYy the way where was LBJ when the shots rang out?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.