Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: going hot

“And the wheel. Wonderful thing, that.”

The “wheel” argument applied to intelligence level is absolutely ignorant. They knew about the wheel, They had game balls hoop games that incorporated the physics of the wheel. They just didn’t need it so why use it? It is very impractical to live nomadic and have to “rely” on the wheel along with the roads, beasts of burden to feed and water, and infrastructure to accommodate the wheel.

Example South America... With no beasts of burden larger than a Llama or Alpaca, why build road systems across the Andes mountains to accommodate the wheel? All they needed were roads big enough for sure footed mountain pack beasts. The Andes were not and are STILL not very friendly to vehicles depending on the wheel.

In survival there is a fine line between the profit and loss of calories gathered and calories burned. Logic dictates you do not waste calories on physical effort you do not really need.


38 posted on 05/18/2024 3:57:55 PM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Openurmind

Yes, much like Africa, ‘they’ needed a domesticated animal source to be able use a wheel, or ‘ride’. Zebra vs. horse argument and all.


40 posted on 05/18/2024 5:12:09 PM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson