Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

“Fast Company reported that the “backlash was swift” and social media users accused Bumble of using language that “invalidated women’s sexual autonomy, the experiences of asexual people, and restrictions on reproductive rights.” “
Oh brother! These people are insufferable.


8 posted on 05/18/2024 2:56:39 AM PDT by Fireone (Who killed Obama's chef?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fireone
Conversely: If the Bumble ads had instead castigated, derided, and subjected to ridicule people (e.g., traditional Christians) who shame women focusing on casual hook-ups... if the ads had instead lauded women as "empowered" and "fully actualized" who rack up correspondingly high body-counts... they would have received absolutely no backlash from that quarter!

In fact, they would have garnered copious praise from "progressives," "leftists," and "feminists."

At the same time, traditional Christians would probably have ignored them (as a "lost cause anyway").

A "win-win" situation for Bumble.

But, as John Belushi was wont to say: No-ooo! No!

They had to go and (very slightly) mock their target audience - which is entirely devoid of humor (at least, when it comes to self-deprecation).

Regards,

9 posted on 05/18/2024 3:29:08 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson