Replies

My comment on keto & ozempic was sarcasm. I HAVE shared my insights, sometimes detailed. It's a significant investment of my meager time to go down that bunny hole one post subject at a time - topics analogous to 2 feet away - especially considering that I've expended thousands of hours in research, notes and writing and possess the 10-mile-high view. Frankly, sometimes it's a chore, but I try. The problem is that like a puzzle, it's useless information without the ENTIRE puzzle (I literally have a chapter describing that aspect).

I truly grasp the concept that asserts a person who understands a topic should be able to explain it simply.

The problem, visually: The image below represents 1, 2 or even 3 comments on a general health matter to someone who doesn't know the full picture

I was trained to process both visually and via composition, but I learned that ultimately I have the ability to 'see' solutions before I fully understand them. My book began as merely an exercise in composition to figure out my own health problems; suddenly I realized it could be a book and help others (that became another thousand hours invested...and that was just the beginning).

I don't intend to 'tease'; my injection of opinion on health matters is my own attempt to motivate a return to the >10-year project spanning 4 volumes, 250k words and >1000 references.

I do apologize for the hit & run snarky comments on some health posts from time to time, but many of them literally prompt a physical reaction (eye roll, smh, and sometimes guttural epithets at the garbage the researchers posit somehow benefits: 100 different 'diets', a thousand different supplements and a million different opinions...ON TOP of what I waded through for research. It's truly nauseating; snark is my release).