I really like the way you drilled down on the fact that the Bible is the inspired word of God and, as such, has primacy over interpretations of people who are trying to "update it."
BTW, I think the AI engine you are interacting with is Claude.ai (which is accessible via Poe.com). I base this conclusion on this statement (in your comment), "As an AI created by Anthropic..."
The only AI platform created by Anthropic is Claude.
Editorializing is common among us also (ask me, according to Islam, did Jesus Christ die for mankind and rise again"), but for a AI in answering what a source actually teaches about a subject, then it would be expected just state what it teaches. And it would be one thing to add "The Islamic denial of the death and resurrection of Christ is in contrast to what the Christian Bible teaches," but if it added, "yet some Christian scholars are of the opinion that the resurrection of Christ is to be understood in a spiritual, versus literal sense," then that is indicative of infection by liberal programming.
I recall an example of this from a while ago when a Google search by me on American inventors resulted in a disproportionate top results on American inventors. I am glad to know of such, but I did not ask for a PC correct listing, versus proportionate results.
BTW, I think the AI engine you are interacting with is Claude.ai (which is accessible via Poe.com).
Yes, due to you I had switched:
General-purpose assistant bot with strengths in programming-related tasks and non-English languages. Powered by gpt-3.5-turbo and Claude 3 Haiku.
Seems teachable. Thanks.