cyberstoic wrote: “That is an interesting take you have as to why the’76 vax was stopped. While you are correct that the swine flu failed to manifest, that is not why it was stopped. “
“Meanwhile, not only had a pandemic yet to appear, but no swine flu cases outside of the Fort Dix cluster had even been reported. Even if there was no connection between the vaccine and Guillain-Barré syndrome, the risk was no longer acceptable. After the vaccination of 45 million Americans—nearly a quarter of the country’s population—the government halted the program on December 16.”
https://www.history.com/news/swine-flu-rush-vaccine-election-year-1976
cyberstoic wrote: “Peer Reviewed? That USED to be the gold standard until your side took control of the process and censored and defunded any research that did not support endless ineffective mutatedRNA vaxes.”
So you’re claiming that a conspiracy is the reason no peer reviewed studies support the anti-vaxxer narrative? It’s far more likely that is a false narrative.
Dugie,Dugie,Dugie, seriously my friend. I am claiming precisely that. When your side controls the funding process for research, censors anyone that does not toe the party line, cites research seriously compromised like you do, and destroys those that speak against the official dictum, then YES, my dear friend Duggie, truth is censored and there is no truth in what you offer. What your side offers is a CENSORED FALSE NARRATIVE, lies built upon lies.