According to this logic,
she should work for minimum wage and the rest should be garnished and sent to the NBA?
This is about relativity and reality.
If the league didn’t exist-this thread doesn’t exist.
The implication is that the endowment that the NBA set up is a given. If she was allowed to sign with the highest bidder that would be under the constraint of expected revenues and endowment funds.
Yes, she, and all the other WNBA players should pay back the NBA. Why should players in the NBA earn less in order to subsidize the WNBA?
It's not a garnished wage when the WNBA players never earned it to start with.