Later in the same sentence he buttresses his claims with a mention of “Crazy Roger's alleged logic”.
In his next sentence, Brother Joe expands his argument with a reference to “Crazy Roger's Dred Scott insane rulings.”
In the next sentence Brother Joe slips into the comfortable “Crazy Roger.”
Next sentence: the all-new “Crazy Roger's insane opinions.”
Next up: “Crazy Roger's opinions.”
And then the surprising: “insanities of Crazy Roger.”
Then an auxiliary argument: “Crazy Roger's lunacies”.
Ending with the valediction: “Crazy Roger's insane opinions”.
Though rather incoherent, Professor Joe's skinny arguments are stylistically consistent.
:)