Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: woodpusher
There is nothing particularly fortunate about that natural born citizen's presidency.

That is an understatement. His "presidency" was a disaster, and it highlighted the exact issues the framers sought to avoid by requiring the president to be a natural citizen.

And he's not a natural born citizen. He is at best a 14th amendment citizen, and we have yet to see any adequate proof that he is even that.

Circumstantial evidence indicates he was born in Canada, and with his mother too young to transfer citizenship, he is possibly a Canadian.

What was fortunate was that no court accepted nonsense as law.

You mispeak. Courts routinely accept nonsense as "the Law!"

Trump's trials are perfect examples of this.

A friend mentioned earlier today how County Tax assessors routinely overvalue properties in order to extract the highest possible taxes.

Should New York try all their tax assessors for doing what they claimed Trump did?

The law is a circus and the administrators of it are often clowns.

123 posted on 04/26/2024 7:14:07 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
And he's not a natural born citizen.

Like Charles Arthur before him (VP and Prez), Obama was also a natural born citizen, having been born in the U.S., subject to its jurisdiction.

Thjere are two classifications of citizen, and two only: naturalized and natural born.

124 posted on 04/26/2024 10:40:44 AM PDT by woodpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson