[DiogenesLamp]

By courts. It is not subject to revision or replacement by dingbats on the internet.

In reality, dingbats on the internet are probably more knowledgeable and more rational than the dingbats on the benches.

*I* certainly know more about the history of how "Natural Born Citizen" became distorted from what it originally meant.

Most of it was done by William Rawle and his anti-slavery crusade.

[woodpusher]

In reality, dingbats on the internet are probably more knowledgeable and more rational than the dingbats on the benches.

So say the dingbats on the internet. Fortunately, the courts ignore their mutterings.

First Nat. Bank and Trust Co. of Vinita v. Kissee, 1993 OK 96, 859 P.2d 502, paragraph 40, footnotes omitted:

“Simply put, subjective good faith no longer provides the safe harbor it once did.” “There is no room for a pure heart, empty head defense under Rule 11.”