Replies

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Virus Prophylaxis and Treatment, Pelham wrote:

Pelham: You may not have been around for the Daily Expose article that claimed that the Covid virus doesn’t exist at all. Some antivax genius posted that article here. I wonder who it was.
ransomnote: The CDC has always combined the influenza and pneumonia data, for no reason, in graphs of seasonal flu. They could have made this obvious but instead they put the letters PI in the title, to represent Pneumonia/Influenza. When they show the yearly 'ominous' rise in flu cases, most people don't realize that pneumonia makes part of that curve on the graph.
Along came 'Covid' and now the CDC infection charts had PIC in the title - again, they could have listed the disease names clearly. PIC was to represent Pneumia/Influenza/Covid totals. Why wouldn't they give those diseases separate lines on the graph? DId they redirected Influenza cases and report them as Covid cases and the public would notice if this was portrayed in 3 separate lines?
Does anyone recall Dr. Birx saying, "Well, we don't have influenza anymore..."

"Where did the flu go? Can Covid just disappear like that too?"
According to the NIH, "For two centuries, Koch’s postulates have set the gold standard for establishing the microbiological etiology of infection and disease. " Although it would have been normal, simple and ethical to satisfy Koch's postulates for the Covid virus, the CDC, CHINA, NIH, FDA etc. just never could get the job done. Therefore, China created a computer model of the Covid virus, instead of testing Koch's postulate with the actual virus, because they said a sample of the isolated Covid virus was 'unavailable.'
So China's computer model of a new 'novel' disease was made by using a library of pre existing sections of other viruses to fill in gaps. One wonders how a 'novel' virus, as the CDC/NIH classified Covid, could be assembled with parts from other viruses when the term 'novel' here meant Covid was entirely new to the human immune system. How would they know if they got it right, without Koch's postulates?
Pharma companies picked up China's computer model of the Covid virus, instead of using Koch's postulates because the pharmas said a sample of the isolated Covid virus was 'unavailable.'So the 'vaccines' were designed to address the computer model created by China, at the same time others were saying the Covid virus was bioengineered and released by China.
The CDC said an isolated sample of the Covid virus was 'unavailable' so they based the PCR test on a 'related Corona Virus', even though Covid was supposed to be 'novel' and not like others.
Why was an isolated sample of the Covid virus 'unavailable throughout the pandemic? Why did the CDC/NIH find it impossible to meet Koch's postulates?
Dr Mikovitz, who got on Fauci's bad side and paid for it dearly, worked at a CDC lab and knows quite a bit about the cell lines she developed there. Mikovitz noted that all the Covid documentation she'd read claimed that research was based on the isolated virus, but with her background she would dig through layers of documentation and find that the research was actually based on a 'lavage' of viruses (a mixture so you can't tell which, if any virus caused what resulting symptom or disease). She also said that the virus research was sometimes based in vero monkey kidney cell line she developed - not in humans.
Covid relies not on science, but on the word of the CDC, China, NIH etc.
Dr Michael Yeadon: Why I Don’t Believe There Ever Was a Covid Virus
By Patricia Harrity on August 11, 2023 • ( 111 Comments )
Pelham: The illness and deaths, you see, resulted from “fake vaccines” that were secretly administered to everyone before “the Plandemic” began.
I've never seen a post or an article like that. Please provide links. (hint: I'm saying you made that up. You know, you're lying.).
Pelham: This may have been peak conspiracy idiocy from a source that never disappoints. And don’t ask how “fake vaccines” were given to everyone before 2020 without anyone remembering a mass vaccination event. Don’t question the story!
Why not question your fake story? Links please.
Pelham: The Daily Expose is put out by a bunch of English poseurs, and this particular fantasy reads like the ravings of David Icke, who also believes in interdimensional lizard people. Not kidding.
You're working hard to distort the truth about the Expose- why? Because the Expose exposed the false 'narrative' over and over again? The Expose never features David Icke's theories about interdeimensional lizard people - you threw that in to conflate the expose-news.com with fantasies.
The Expose provides very important information from officials in the UK medical system, analyzes their reports, the reports of the CDC with the assistance of medical experts. This is why the deep state is trying to break them by freezing their funds. The Expose is the only source I've seen of data about the 'shots' which allows patients to type in their vaccine lot number and find out if that lot had an unusually high number of deaths or adverse events. 5% of the vaccine lots are responsible for most of the deaths.
For those interested - here's the link to use to check your 'vaccine' lot:
How harmful is my COVID-19 Vaccine Batch? – FIND OUT NOW…
You may worship MSM 'narratives' but many of us want the unvarnished truth instead. These are citizen journalists who are hated for not towing the MSM line.
Pelham: Donald Trump, btw, still believes in the efficacy of the Covid vaccines. Trump, vs the Gnostic Lizard People of The Daily Expose.
THere you go - falsely conflating the Expose with your Lizard people. Donald Trump, God loves him, is not a doctor.
But you and your kind have said all these sneers before - it's like you're running a distraction campaign by recycling your trash here.

Another day, another oportunity to make a fool of yourself. And you never pass up the chance!

Covid is a virus. Koch’s Postulates don’t don’t work on viruses.

How do we know that?

Because Robert Koch and Friedrich Loeffler, the authors of Koch’s Postulates, knew about that problem themselves. Oops.

You’d know it too if you actually had an education and weren’t just playacting, reciting the crackpot nonsense that you find at The Daily Expose.

Oh and you never do get around to answering whether or not you still believe that the Covid virus “doesn’t exist”. Why is that? A simple yes or no is all that it takes.

Here’s a little history of the discovery that Koch’s Postulates were useless in identifying viruses as the agent of disease; read and learn:

https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_(Boundless)/10%3A_Epidemiology/10.01%3A_Principles_of_Epidemiology/10.1D%3A__Kochs_Postulates

Koch’s postulates are four criteria designed to establish a causal relationship between a causative microbe and a disease. The postulates were formulated by Robert Koch and Friedrich Loeffler in 1884 and refined and published by Koch in 1890. Koch applied the postulates to establish the etiology of anthrax and tuberculosis, but they have been generalized to other diseases.

Koch’s postulates were developed in the 19th century as general guidelines to identify pathogens that could be isolated with the techniques of the day. Even in Koch’s time, it was recognized that some infectious agents were clearly responsible for disease even though they did not fulfill all of the postulates. Attempts to rigidly apply Koch’s postulates to the diagnosis of viral diseases in the late 19th century, at a time when viruses could not be seen or isolated in culture, may have impeded the early development of the field of virology.

Currently, a number of infectious agents are accepted as the cause of disease despite their not fulfilling all of Koch’s postulates. Therefore, while Koch’s postulates retain historical importance and continue to inform the approach to microbiologic diagnosis, fulfillment of all four postulates is not required to demonstrate causality.

And this:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10470267/

When Loeffler took his first steps in the newly-emerging field of virology, the aim and the methods of his research activities were influenced by two different issues: 1) Loeffler was rooted in the scientific paradigm of bacteriology, but during the progress of his research on foot-and-mouth-disease (FMD) he recognized that the classical techniques derived from bacteriology were useless in identifying the agent of this disease. Thus he focussed on the properties of the pathogen and—though he could not find a method in order to visualize the ‘virus’—he tried to develop a vaccine against the disease.

...And there’s more!:

Koch’s Postulates and Infectious Proteins

Koch’s postulates were formulated in the late nineteenth century as guidelines for establishing that microbes cause specific diseases. Because the rules were developed for living agents—particularly bacteria—their applicability to inanimate pathogens such as viruses and infectious proteins has been problematic. The unorthodox mechanism by which prion diseases are transmitted, involving specific physicochemical characteristics of the protein as well as susceptibility traits of the host, has made these disorders refractory to analysis within the context of the original Koch’s postulates. In addition, evidence is accumulating that other proteopathies, such as AA amyloidosis, apolipoprotein AII amyloidosis, and cerebral Aβ amyloidosis, can be induced in vulnerable recipients by cognate proteinaceous agents. In light of the salient differences in the mode of disease-transmission by microbes and proteins, we propose modifications of Koch’s postulates that will specifically accommodate presumed infectious proteins.