No, she’s not helpful. She is, for different reasons, not well liked or respected in the US. Having her there with Trump at a trial involving payments to a whore only embarrass her, which is very wrong. If there is any trial she should NOT be at, it is this one. And I think she has enough self-respect to stay away, which she has so far.
“ She is, for different reasons, not well liked or respected in the US”
Definitely not by the propaganda media which slants the vast majority of people’s opinions about almost everything.
I agree. She knows she is not charismatic.
She was a model. And a trophy wife.
> Having her there with Trump at a trial involving payments to a whore only embarrass her, which is very wrong. If there is any trial she should NOT be at, it is this one.
I was not thinking specifically about the hush payments trial when I wrote the base post. Subtract the hush payments trial (political as it probably is), and that still leaves all the other political aspects in which she could be helpful.
> And I think she has enough self-respect to stay away, which she has so far.
OK, you seem to have made up your mind about Trump already, I see. (I could just as easily make up my mind about your gender and politics, and maybe come to a more accurate conclusion than yours.) You think any of these trials have any basis in law? Sounds like a very east coast mode of thinking to me. Manhattan? or maybe just Arlington?
You have it exactly backwards as usual, because you believe the allegations.
Theirs is no shame in supporting your husband who is facing false accusations regarding a whore.
“She is, for different reasons, not well liked or respected in the US”