Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: John S Mosby

In certain states raw milk is labeled “not for human consumption” or “pets only”. If that is what you’re referring to when you say for use of calves then you could’ve been more clear. And you accused such practices as being “probably unsafe”.

I’m not making any assumptions or knee jerking. Your comments come across as very anti-raw milk or at least very skeptical of it. Which means you’re essentially siding with the government hacks. It’s their baseless allegations and claims against raw milk & their withholding of facts from the public that has enable their power.


56 posted on 04/20/2024 9:27:39 AM PDT by surroundedbyblue (Proud to be an Infidel & a deplorable. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: surroundedbyblue

You could not be more wrong. Problem with associative assumption. Made that clear to you in my previous post— where am coming from. Nothing wrong with raw milk. My comments were how to get it... the right way, and not depend on others for it. You know, like farmers actually do? It’s too bad industry will never address this in favor of mass production of watery emulsion of fat with no flavor or additional nutrients. We’re done here. Think what you will, cause you will anyway.


79 posted on 04/20/2024 4:47:31 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson