Just a little side note here. Many years back I found a great online article about a math teacher/professor who had his class work on Simpson’s guilt or innocence using mathematics. They weighted pieces of evidence that were not in dispute. For example, the killer walked away from the scene bleeding from the left side of his body. The next day O.J. Simpson had a cut on his the middle finger of his left hand. What are the odds of that happening? They used other pieces of evidence like the killer wearing a size 12 shoe, and that’s what Simpson wore, etc. I think they looked at 8 to 10 pieces of evidence and after working it all out mathematically they put the odds of anyone else other than Simpson being the killer at something like 50 trillion to one.
O.J. Simpson murdered two people.
> O.J. Simpson murdered two people. <
Oh, yes. The defense successfully argued that the police were racist, and tried to frame Simpson. That argument gained traction because one of the LA detectives, Mark Fuhrman, is a total piece of garbage.
Fuhrman previously used racist language. And he tried to claim a job disability because he hated blacks. He’s trash, complete trash. Because of him (and the prosecutor’s incompetence) a filthy murderer walked free.
But the glove didn’t fit...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYMGcLRtqn4
Meanwhile, a jury in Wisconsin just found Nic Miu guilty of 1st Degree Reckless Homocide.
Hillary still has him by a mile!