Sounds like he needs a bigger sample size...
However, while by God's design, there is adaptation - a form of limited micro evolution - and science can somewhat discover how God created things,yet the reality is that an exceedingly vast, systematically ordered universe, exquisitely finely tuned for corporeal life with its profound intricate complexity and extensive diversity , logically testifies to design, requiring a First Cause (at the least), that of a powerful being of supreme intelligence being behind the existence of energy and organization of matter. And the creation and design of man is part of that.
That all can be a result of purely natural processes itself requires much faith.
The female body is optimized for child bearing. The male body is optimized to provide for and protect the female. But try telling that to a feminist.
Try telling the sicko lefties this.
Gosh, it’s almost as if nature intended males and females to have different survival roles. Oh, wait. That’s sexist. Everyone knows a 110-pound woman can beat a dozen 250-pound men with one punch each. I’ve seen the movies.
That all can be a result of purely natural processes itself requires much faith.
This is impossible. What about all those movies with women beating the crap out of men? How do they explain Kill Bill?
Somebody needs to run a research project on Carrier to study the hypothesis of "the guy is an idiot."
Sounds like he needs a bigger sample size...
It's a MAGA trick to scare feminists into submission. Don't fall for, sisters! You can beat up Mike Tyson - as long as that is your truth! :)
This cannot be true!
Just the other night (on TV) I saw a 115-lb female whip the crap out of three ferocious men...
Surely, TV cannot be lying to us...
Maybe my lying 90-year-old eyes are lying to me...
This simple biological fact lies at the heart of women’s objection to sharing lavatories and dressing rooms with trans women (biological men) and you rarely hear objections of men who share their spaces with trans men (biological women). It would be similar to an average man sharing his personal space with a bodybuilder on steroids. The “transwoman” and the ‘roid rager are the 800 pound gorillas and can do whatever they wish.
So why are we wasting tax dollars to integrate women in infantry combat units? No wonder PT has become a joke. 162% stronger, and by some miracle the average female is going to make up that difference. Please stop the nonsense!
science fact, unlike liberal, woke fiction.
From the University of “...Duh...”
It does appear that our country has made the choice that the negative impact this will have on our police and firefighter is far outweighed by the wonders of diversity. That criminal will not be apprehended by a female police officer (or the direct jump to lethal force will take place, bypassing the physical attempts to subdue) or the female firefighter cannot carry an unconscious man from a burning structure. Those lives, yours and mine, are considered expendable to the cause if DIE/DEI.
And they will soon make that jump to military forces, particularly in the combat roles, and it will be done because we cannot make recruiting goals. (This was all intentional, the inclusion of open homosexuals and females into combat roles, deliberately driving males out.) And the type of men who SHOULD enlist are not enlisting due to this deliberate and in-your-face alienation of them, and the exact people who should NOT be in the military or in those combat roles...are being sought out and enticed to enlist.
Here is that graph that explains the female aspect:
This has nothing to do with women not being intellectually capable of a job. It has everything, when working with average individual and unit capabilities as the military does, to do with the inability to perform jobs needed when going head to head against a foe who does not employ females in those roles.
There are many people who confuse individual capability with average capability or peak capability.
While it is true at an individual level that there may be a female who can physically outperform a given male as Billie Jean King showed when playing against a male who was many years her senior, and not even a particularly good tennis player, on average, this will not happen.
And it isn't an issue of the sexist men keeping the women down. In marathons, women have been given every encouragement and opportunity, and they aren't going head to head with men, but the fastest female marathoner finishes over ten minutes behind the fastest male marathoner. In the Boston Marathon last year, 35 males crossed the finish line before the first female crossed.
And when one reaches a peak of performance, as is found in the populations of US Military Special Forces, unless the physical requirements are weakened or dropped (as they WILL inevitably be) a woman, even one who has trained to her peak and resides at the peak of that pyramid that is female physical strength, will NEVER be able to compete with the men who inhabit the tip of that pyramid. Never.
Hollywood not withstanding.
In the woke world of the liberals...
a battalion of women combat soldiers is capable of taking on a battalion of men in combat, and the women would or could or should win. Nature says different.
But, Wonder Woman is real.
In the real world, women are chatty and men are mighty.
Still some female MMA fighters I would not step into the ring with.
“Why males pack a powerful punch...males’ upper bodies, on average...90% more strength than females...punching motion was 162% greater than females’”
I guess when a person with an xy gene who declares himself to be a female must have been born without those muscles ... riiiight
So they did “research” to find out what everyone in the world knows, and then the article tries in vain to lessen the impact of the truth on the reader.
Science daily is not a scientific journal.