Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: airdalecheif
...it debases the president to get onstage with such a buffoon.

That is why there were no presidential debates in 1964 and 1968.

In 1964 the "buffoon" was Goldwater, and the Democrats didn't want him defining himself against the image that LBJ had set for him.

In 1968 the "buffoon" was Wallace, and both parties feared he could throw the election into the House and set back the civil rights revolution for decades. The Republicans feared his inroads in the South, ruining Nixon's "southern strategy." The Democrats feared he would siphon off union votes from Humphrey.

These so-called debates are canned exhibitions of sound bites, so they might as well be abolished.

6 posted on 04/12/2024 2:09:58 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Publius

bttt


8 posted on 04/12/2024 2:23:09 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a Simple Manner for a Happy Life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Publius

Nixon didn’t debate McGovern in 1972. In fact, he never said his name in public.


11 posted on 04/12/2024 2:41:00 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson