Posted on 04/09/2024 6:09:55 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Yeah, it’s gonna get even warmer for the EU...courtesy of the Russians.
“EU climate service: March 2024 hottest on record; 10th straight record-breaking month”
So how many of their temperature sensors were placed next to airport runways, in parking lots and on buildings in the middle of big cities?
The European Union’s Copernicus Climate Change Service fails to understand it’s been happening from the last ice age.
“...the average March temperature during the “pre-industrial” reference period, designated as 1850-1900...”
Record keeping started in 1880, and anything before that, is complete and made-up BS. (As is mostly all stuff, after that, if demonKKKrats have touched it.).
All their measurement instruments are located on black tar roofs at universities situated in urban heat zone cities.
Duh!
I don’t believe any of the stuff where they’re comparing against estimates of 150 years ago. A year-to-year change in monthly average temp measured on the same set of modern instruments I can believe. But, a sudden jump in the data sounds like a transient event, not human produced CO2, and that massive (and mostly unreported) undersea volcano does seem like a possibility.
It’s the WEATHER!
WHEN, I say WHEN, have they EVER been able to predict weather accurately?
There are so many “forces” at work contributing to our climate.
MAN as in HU-MAN has NOTHING TO DO WITH any of them.
The sun, the moon, ocean currents, air currents, volcanos (above AND BELOW the ocean surface), precipitation, hurricanes, typhoons, tornadoes, heat waves, ice ages.
Puny humans are NOT a significant enough presence on earth to be able to affect climate change.
Most of the world, land and sea is devoid of humans.
Humans: 8 Billion, 8,000,000,000
Insects 10 Quintillion 10, 000,000,000,000,000,000
Maybe we SHOULD eat more insects? There sure are a lot of them. AND they all FART! (emit climate change gasses.)
Yesterday’s eclipse highlights why I don’t believe in global warming:
1) The people who predicted when and where the total eclipse would occur got it right and right down to the minute or maybe even second, plus they got it right YEARS in advance. That illustrates that they UNDERSTAND the system they’re talking about.
2) The day before the eclipse I watched a show where they were saying the most important factor to being able to have a good view of the eclipse was to have clear weather. The show then proceeded to tell the audience that the cloud cover in Texas and New England was going to make viewing the eclipse pretty iffy. But they said, in very large center part of the country the skies were going to be clear and for those of us living here we’d have a clear and unobstructed view. Well, I don’t know about Texas and New England, but here is Central Kentucky it was very cloudy and I could only get an occasional view.
To me this proves that climate people just DON’T HAVE THE UNDERSTANDING of the weather systems well enough to lecture to me that we’re all gonna die in less than 10 years.
It’s the overall earth temperature not a point North Carolina. But what was it before the records were kept? They never discuss that.
I think I knew that...not quite sure. I do recall, the temperature (we live by day-t-day) is measured measured 5 feet off the ground, maybe?
“But what was it before the records were kept? They never discuss that.”
That’s a cat they don’t want to let outta the bag...
The EUSSR has no shame in that they appropriate Copernicus’ name for their climate propaganda agency.
It’s not real. Why are you pushing proof by assertion?
Yep. The warming over the past two years is *too* fast for their warming models to be correct for the effects of CO2.
Boy that’s true. I hate when they say, “this hasn’t happened in 100 years!” Really. That’s a second in how long earth has been around.
The data from USA temperature satellites is real, and the two University of Alabama at Huntsville professors who administer the program and analyze the satellite data have never been part of the Global Warming political hysteria.
Is the data accurate or meaningful?
I am not a scientist, but there is 45 years of data, and the temperature trend is up, and the last 10 months have set 45 year records for highest temperature anomalies.
As to the USA Climate Reference Network, the data is pristine, and several months in the last ten have set high temperature anomaly records.
The data is pristine.
Is it meaningful? I do not know.
I have been reading the commentary of the two UAB professors for 20 years.
I am not a scientist or engineer, so my comments about global temperatures would be pointless.
However, I am a self taught political expert, and I can say there is ZERO political intent, or content, in the UAB commentary about global temperatures.
There is actually a third data source I consult almost every day about global warming - “Real Time Global Temperature.”
That source gathers 50,000 - 70,000 current local temperatures every HOUR and distills it into a running average.
From 2015-2022, the average global temp anomaly DECLINED for seven straight years.
It went up 0.44 F in 2023.
The current deviation is + 0.98 F, which is the highest in nine years of data.
The guys who crunched that data are absolutely Global Warming Skeptics.
As I said in my first post, I believe what we are seeing in 2024 is clearly related to the stratosphere water vapor that was ejected by the ocean volcano.
Okay.
Just doesn’t translate to any kind of catastrophic “warming” that the cultists are screaming about. Merely natural processes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.