Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CDR Kerchner

Here’s where I hang my hat. Vattel and the letter between Jay and Washington concerned about a “foreigner” being commander in chief.

If you have a choice at birth let’s say like Obama who could be a Brit by virtue of his father’s citizenship or a US by virtue of his mother (assuming he was born in Hawaii), then you are not natural born to the US because you have a choice. It would seem that the founders coming off the revolution would not want the son or daughter of a British citizen to be president, even though they grandfathered themselves.

So the citizenship of the parents determines. Jindal, Obama, Haley, Harris, Vivek not eligible.

I do acknowledge we need congressional action or USSC decision to have any certainty. Of course the court rejected 6 cases on Obama’s qualifications.


8 posted on 04/03/2024 8:04:31 PM PDT by coalminersson (since )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: coalminersson

ditto


10 posted on 04/03/2024 9:11:43 PM PDT by justrepublican (Screaming like a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: coalminersson

Don’t leave Cruz off that list.


11 posted on 04/03/2024 9:27:40 PM PDT by moonhawk (Jeffrey Epstein did't kill himself; George Floyd did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: coalminersson

Concur..this is the correct definition


14 posted on 04/04/2024 5:53:59 AM PDT by bunkerhill7 (Don't shoot until you see the whites of their lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: coalminersson

“I do acknowledge we need congressional action or USSC decision to have any certainty. Of course the court rejected 6 cases on Obama’s qualifications.’

I agree with most of what you said except the above.

Congress can NOT fix this. It HAS TO BE A constitutional amendment. PERIOD!!!!

SCOTUS CAN make a determination. “Interpret” the constitution is EXACTLY what they are there for.

In this highly politicized time/court, they don’t want to touch this with a ten foot pole.

I fear their decision would NOT be what I THINK the framers meant.

I think they would interpret it (MAKE NEW LAW), in a way that I would be sure that the framers would NOT agree with.

To make this “right”, they would be saying that Obama was illegitimate. Which he WAS, but they won’t say it/CAN’T say it.

A constitutional amendment is the ONLY way to fix this correctly.

It will NEVER happen.


25 posted on 04/04/2024 9:46:58 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson