We have only this man’s word that this is the case, and I see his response as excessively disproportionate to the alleged threat he faced.
~~~~~
We are not considering whether or not the dog broke the law. We are considering if the shooter had no right to defend himself. You have no evidence that he did not.
*YOU* have no evidence that the dog represented any sort of serious threat to the man.
*YOU* come up with evidence to prove it did.