Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nagant
You can’t do that here, and he stands innocent by right of self defense until you can.

He stands guilty by virtue of the fact that company policy prohibits their delivery persons from carrying firearms........

And considering the facts that there were no bite marks nor torn pants, it's strictly his personal testimony that has no evidence of his claim.

Try supporting his claim when hopefully Angie sues the pants off of Instacart..........

150 posted on 04/02/2024 1:54:10 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: Hot Tabasco

~~~~~
He stands guilty by virtue of the fact that company policy prohibits their delivery persons from carrying firearms........
~~~~~

Yes, the company has the right to discipline their employee, but not because of anything he did to the dog. None of that has anything to do with legal guilt.

~~~~~
And considering the facts that there were no bite marks nor torn pants, it’s strictly his personal testimony that has no evidence of his claim.
~~~~~

Morality and the law do not require victims to submit to having the cr@p beaten out of them before they have a right to defend themselves from eminent credible threat.

Was the delivery man being threatened by the dog? AGAIN, prove that he wasn’t. Otherwise he stands innocent.


152 posted on 04/02/2024 2:32:41 PM PDT by nagant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson