He stands guilty by virtue of the fact that company policy prohibits their delivery persons from carrying firearms........
And considering the facts that there were no bite marks nor torn pants, it's strictly his personal testimony that has no evidence of his claim.
Try supporting his claim when hopefully Angie sues the pants off of Instacart..........
~~~~~
He stands guilty by virtue of the fact that company policy prohibits their delivery persons from carrying firearms........
~~~~~
Yes, the company has the right to discipline their employee, but not because of anything he did to the dog. None of that has anything to do with legal guilt.
~~~~~
And considering the facts that there were no bite marks nor torn pants, it’s strictly his personal testimony that has no evidence of his claim.
~~~~~
Morality and the law do not require victims to submit to having the cr@p beaten out of them before they have a right to defend themselves from eminent credible threat.
Was the delivery man being threatened by the dog? AGAIN, prove that he wasn’t. Otherwise he stands innocent.