Read my posts again. My only claim was that you are wrong to proclaim the delivery man’s guilt.
But thanks for proving that vicious dog ownership is about ego surrogacy.
I don't think anyone is disputing that he shot the dog. I think the question is whether or not he was justified in doing so. I haven't seen what I consider credible evidence that he was.
Maybe he was, I just haven't seen any proof that this dog represented such a threat that shooting it was a reasonable thing to do.
But thanks for proving that vicious dog ownership is about ego surrogacy.
I think what I showed is that some people make up their minds based on a dislike of a certain type of people, such as famous actresses, and I consider this to be a very different thing than looking at the facts without bias.
I don't care who Angie Harmon is, I would look at this case the same way if this wasn't some sort of famous person.