*YOU* have no evidence that the dog represented any sort of serious threat to the man.
*YOU* come up with evidence to prove it did.
~~~~~
AGAIN. The delivery man doesn’t have to prove anything. The onus to prove something is on the perspective prosecution. The delivery man is innocent until proven guilty.
I'm not arguing with the delivery man, i'm arguing with *YOU*.
You want to make claims, *YOU* prove them. *YOU* have no evidence the dog was aggressive.