Blue-city prosecutors and their lynch mobs

American Thinker ^ | 31 Mar, 2024 | Joe Fried

[MtnClimber]

When citizens expose vote fraud, you can bet that Democrat prosecutors and juries will convict them hard.

Democrats don’t discriminate. They want to convict all “election deniers,” whether they are white, black, men, women, young, or old. This week, 47-year-old Kimberly Zapata learned that she may spend years in prison for exposing weaknesses in Wisconsin’s election system.

Zapata was the deputy director of the Milwaukee Election Commission, and she saw a major vulnerability in the system: anyone in Wisconsin could easily obtain military absentee ballots — real ones — simply by requesting them. And once people acquired those ballots, they could use them without satisfying the normal ID requirements.

How easy was it to get military ballots? To get three nice new ones, Zapata merely went to the public website (“My Vote Wisconsin”) and entered three phony names, three made-up Social Security numbers, and a phony mailing address. Zapata did not need to use any special passwords or equipment.

It is obvious that Zapata wasn’t trying to alter election results. We know that because the phony address she used was that of Janel Brandtjen, who was the chair of the Campaigns and Elections Committee of the Wisconsin Assembly. As the convicted felon stated in court, she was simply trying to bring a glaring security weakness to the attention of the public. Some people would call her a whistleblower.

Here are the 3 ballots received by Representative Brandtjen.

Unfortunately, Representative Brandtjen didn’t understand how and why she received the ballots, so she contacted authorities and the media. That led to the legal troubles for Zapata.

All of this was carefully explained in court, but to no avail. That’s because blue cities no longer use juries; instead, they use twelve-person lynch mobs.

[MtnClimber]

And real election fraud goes unpunished.

[Cowman]

Well, in the old gangster movies the stool pigeons always end up wearing cement overshoes. The principle is much the same.

[stinkerpot65]

And gutless Republicans say nothing

[FrankRizzo890]

That’s the plan you see. First, if you bring it up, they’ll say “That’s impossible, it can’t be done”. Then, when you do it to show them that it IS possible, you’ve committed a crime, and they unleash the gestapo on you.

There’s a story of a hacker who contacted the rail service in (France I think it was), to alert them that he had found a way to hack their access cards in a way that would allow him to ride the trains for free. He detailed the whole hack and how it would be used against them. They told him it was impossible, he didn’t know what he was talking about. He did the hack, and added credits to his card, and they immediately had him arrested for it. SSDD.

[Chewbarkah]

I guess Zapata didn’t know that “Snitches get Stitches” applied to her. The article lacks critical details, but the conduct Zapata was convicted for occurred on 10-25-2022.

Zapata got herself in trouble by not going to Brandtjen directly, presumably from fear of retribution were it known that she helped expose a Dem cheating technique. Failing to clue in Brandtjen in advance led to her undoing.

I wonder: how many Military Absentee Ballots in that election were actually requested; how many ballots sent out; how many counted (article shows 6886 “Military Votes” in 2020 election; 1631 in 2022 election); how many returned but found to be fraudulent and not counted. What changes if any were made after Z exposed the vulnerability? Whether the 2020 military ballots were scutinized for identity fraud?