There are only two motives for make escalation your objective. One is reckless (assuming they will back down) and the other one is suicide.
Posted on 03/25/2024 6:33:31 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Simplicius the Thinker makes a common sensical observation regarding the initial interrogations of the terrorist perps in Russia. If you’ve watched the videos, you’ll know that these weren’t true interrogations—just rough and ready basic questions, probably to establish the base line cover story before the real interrogations begin:
SIMPLICIUS Ѱ @simpatico771
The terrorists are just reciting their rehearsed speech about 'anonymous' Telegram 'shadowy figures' hiring them.
But in reality, they were caught heading to the Ukrainian border which already proves they had contacts there waiting for them, which virtually confirms it was an SBU job.
Remember when Vladlen Tatarsky was killed, the killer Daria Trepova also played stupid and claimed she knew nothing and was given a statue of whose contents she wasn't aware.
But in the trial it was discovered she lied about everything and was instrumental in the assassination plot.
Same thing will likely be revealed here.
6:20 AM · Mar 23, 2024
In the previous post I referenced Victoria Nuland’s recent claim that “Putin will face some nasty surprises on the battlefield”—that’s the actual direct quote. But she also refers in that exact context to “asymmetric warfare.” In the context of her remarks she’s clearly not referring to bombs and missiles and artillery shells. “Asymmetric” is a very specific word, a word intended to distinguish that type of warfare from “symmetric” warfare: shell for shell, bomb for bomb, missile for missile. The next tweet contains the 24 second clip of Nuland making that statement, in which she touts Ukraine’s “asymmetric warefare” capabilities. Yeah, I thought we just gave the Ukro-Nazis money and munitions? How does Nuland know about the Ukrainian “asymmetric warfare that has been most effective"?
DD Geopolitics @DD_Geopolitics
A month ago (to the day!) at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Victoria "F the EU" Nuland promised the aid to Ukraine would allow them to "accelerate the asymmetric warfare that has been most effective" and that Putin is "sure to face some nasty surprises."
Nuland left her post as the Deputy Secretary of State 10 days prior to this video. Moscow civilians were killed today in an act of terrorism (asymmetrical warfare).
9:55 PM · Mar 22, 2024
Another tweeter makes this shrewd observation—recalling that Biden and Nuland both bragged about the Nordstream sabotage before the fact. Now, in retrospect, was the publicized Sullivan trip to Kiev to tell them, no more attacks on Russia, intended to distance the directors and trainers?
It wasn’t too long ago Victoria Nuland told us about plans for asymmetrical warfare[Terrorism] and “nasty surprises for Putin”.
Mary Kostakidis @MaryKostakidis
They can’t help bragging about it before they do it. Like the pipeline....
I don’t have an opinion yet. Too soon...there is sure to be more information and I don’t trust any of the parties releasing “news” about this.
Ain’t life grand. Enjoy your three score and ten as best you
can. Varying groups have different objectives and who will
rule is never a sure thing.
Muslims attack Russia again and somehow it is now Ukraine’s fault.
So terrorism in Moscow on mostly civilians is ‘asymmetric warfare’?
Even if it’s asymmetric, what strategic objective does it accomplish?
ISIS took credit.
The most obvious explanation (occams razor) for saying it was Ukraine is because Russia is fighting Ukraine in a hot war with them.
I’m not saying it wasn’t Ukraine, but it’s not like we haven’t been flooded with propaganda from both sides for the last few years. This not being propaganda would be the exception, not the pattern.
Why head for the Ukrainian border? The entire border is militarized and controlled by Russia.
All of the information is coming from unreliable sources.
FYI, Mark Wauck is a douchebag.
ISIS attacked Russia because of Putin's big claim to be "Christian" (LOL) and because they are vying for attention.
Given the probable history of Russian false flag operations justifying the second Chechen War, there's a distinct possibility this was an FSB operation or that the FSB allowed it to move forward simply because Putin found it politically useful to justify further mobilization.
Cui bono? Certainly not Ukraine.
The terrorists heading toward Ukraine could have been done to make it look like Ukraine. See also this theory:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/4226710/posts?page=1
and that Putin is “sure to face some nasty surprises.”
********
As much as I detest war pig Nuland & wherever she shows up overseas, bad things tend to happen, if you read her actual speech, 3 words have been left out: “on the battlefield. Left out twice actually from comments I’ve heard, when she refers to asymmetric warfare & nasty surprises.
Those 3 words change the context from general (could apply anywhere, including the Crocus City Hall & a terror attack) to fairly specific (the battlefield).
From speech:
“With this money, Ukraine will be able to fight back in the East and accelerate the asymmetric warfare that has been most effective on the battlefield. And as I said in Kyiv three weeks ago, this supplemental funding will ensure Putin faces some nasty surprises on the battlefield this year.”
Thanks for that quote.
That worked for me when the official narrative of our government was that DJT was a Russian operative.
Yes, the idea that the terrorists planned their escape through the front lines is absurd.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.