Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hardspunned; MeganC

The anti-tank weapons keep changing, so the protection systems have to be constantly modified to keep up.

If the protection systems are just going to be constantly changing add-ons it doesn’t make any sense to build very expensive and complicated tanks, which still depend on survival for future updates.

Right now a T55 with a cage and top mount reactive armor is actually more survivable than an Abrams w/o that stuff.

As we have seen from some of the recent Abrams destruction videos.

Not surprising that the NeoCon supporters of eternal war, also love the MICs most expensive and useless weapons.

(maybe that’s who pays the bills)


25 posted on 03/20/2024 1:46:42 PM PDT by Reverend Wright ( Everything touched by progressives, dies !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Reverend Wright; hardspunned

“Right now a T55 with a cage and top mount reactive armor is actually more survivable than an Abrams w/o that stuff.”

Nope. The cage doesn’t help.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXeYA6On2B8


33 posted on 03/20/2024 1:53:18 PM PDT by MeganC ("Russians are subhuman" - posted by Kazan 8 March 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright

Slightly better defense but nothing an experienced drone operator can’t handle.


37 posted on 03/20/2024 1:57:07 PM PDT by hardspunned (Former DC GOP globalist stooge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson