Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux
At the end of this speech I thought it was interesting that he attributed to the Jewish people the saying ... "Workers of the world unite!" Was he equating Jews with Communists?
9 posted on 03/19/2024 5:47:01 AM PDT by The Duke (Not without incident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Duke

I’m glad you brought that up. Yes. I think that’s exactly what he meant.


11 posted on 03/19/2024 5:50:02 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (A person who seeks the truth with a closed mind will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: The Duke

That was his shtick to differentiate his brand of socialism to the near identical soviet brand of socialism.


14 posted on 03/19/2024 5:54:58 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: The Duke

Marx was a Jew.


15 posted on 03/19/2024 5:56:04 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: The Duke
"Workers of the world unite!" Was he equating Jews with Communists?

If so, he was correct in this one point. Many Jews (certainly not all) were and are communists.

18 posted on 03/19/2024 6:27:16 AM PDT by Avalon Memories (Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats. -- P.J. O’Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: The Duke
At the end of this speech I thought it was interesting that he attributed to the Jewish people the saying ... "Workers of the world unite!" Was he equating Jews with Communists?

Of course he does. Even modern anti-Semites like Candace Owens do this regularly, by blaming Jews for "the Bolshevist holocaust of Russian Christians," despite the fact that 10% of Bolsheviks were Jews.

22 posted on 03/19/2024 6:45:53 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: The Duke
Was [Hitler] equating Jews with Communists?
Hitler hated Jews (thereby attracting antisemites - and antisemitism was pretty mainstream in Germany, and FTM was far from unknown in America) and was competing directly with the Communists for the support of those who hated/feared (actual) liberalism.
Although our modern socialists' promise of greater freedom is genuine and sincere, in recent years observer after observer has been impressed by the unforeseen consequences of socialism, the extraordinary similarity in many respects of the conditions under 'communism' and 'fascism'. As the writer Peter Drucker expressed it in 1939,
'the complete collapse of the belief in the attainability of freedom and equality through Marxism has forced Russia to travel the same road toward a totalitarian society of unfreedom and inequality which Germany has been following. Not that communism and fascism are essentially the same. Fascism is the stage reached after communism has proved an illusion, and it has proved as much an illusion in Russia as in pre-Hitler Germany.
No less significant is the intellectual outlook of the rank and file in the communist and fascist movements in Germany before 1933. The relative ease with which a young communist could be converted into a Nazi or vice versa was well known, best of all to the propagandists of the two parties. The communists and Nazis clashed more frequently with each other than with other parties simply because they competed for the same type of mind and reserved for each other the hatred of the heretic. Their practice showed how closely they are related. To both, the real enemy, the man with whom they had nothing in common, was the liberal of the old type. While to the Nazi the communist and to the communist the Nazi, and to both the socialist, are potential recruits made of the right timber, they both know that there can be no compromise between them and those who really believe in individual freedom.

What is promised to us as the Road to Freedom is in fact the Highroad to Servitude. For it is not difficult to see what must be the consequences when democracy embarks upon a course of planning. The goal of the planning will be described by some such vague term as 'the general welfare'. There will be no real agreement as to the ends to be attained, and the effect of the people's agreeing that there must be central planning, without agreeing on the ends, will be rather as if a group of people were to commit themselves to take a journey together without agreeing where they want to go: with the result that they may all have to make a journey which most of them do not want at all.
____________— F A Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (May, 1945 Reader’s Digest Condensed Version)

If you read The Road to Serfdom (Reader’s Digest Condensed Version here), you will see that FA Hayek used the term “liberal” to denote people who today would be called “conservatives” in America. That is because Hayek, an Austrian, learned English in America before the meaning of “liberal” was essentially inverted, according to Safire's New Political Dictionary, in the 1920s. And the meaning of “liberal” was not changed in Britain, where Hayek wrote Serfdom during WWII.

33 posted on 03/19/2024 8:09:35 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: The Duke
"Jewish Bolshevism" was the Nazis' bête noire:

"It was the Jews who discovered Marxism, and the Jews who have attempted for decades to revolutionize the world with it"--Wochenspruch der NSDAP (Nazi Party Saying of the Week), Zentralverlag der NSDAP (Cantral Press of the Nazi Party), 1941

34 posted on 03/19/2024 8:16:01 AM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson