To: Responsibility2nd
If he was 100% in the bag for her he would have ruled in her favor, not left her bleeding on the floor in a near impossible situation to deal with.
39 posted on
03/15/2024 11:45:10 AM PDT by
Golden Eagle
(It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them that they've been fooled. )
To: Golden Eagle
45 posted on
03/15/2024 11:48:42 AM PDT by
laplata
(They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
To: Golden Eagle
If he was 100% in the bag for her he would have ruled in her favor, not left her bleeding on the floor in a near impossible situation to deal with.Right. Exactly. The judge ruled down the middle in his own best interest. Willis is in for a rough ride no matter what and could be politically toxified after this is all done. Judges court kicks the can and rules on the safe and effective parts only. Judicial cowardice.
78 posted on
03/15/2024 1:01:15 PM PDT by
paulcissa
(Politicians want you unarmed because they intend on doing things that you would shoot them for.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson