Replies

The Ukrainian propagandists in the Forum are shrieking that the Ukraine is winning and always has been winning etc. I believe this is to move public opinion to support funding for the Deep State's control of that region.
With Ukrainian boys as young as 15 and men, including the disabled, in their 60's under equipped and conscripted, shipped to the front lines, FR's Zeeper apologists insist that they have Russia on the ropes. Meanwhile, Zelensky has warned women to prepare for conscription. Zelensky's trained army has dwindled to the point that he has to depend on conscripts.
At the same time, Ukraine's supporters deride Putin's use of convicts, in addition to his regular army troops. In the battle between the Ukraine's under-equipped conscripts supporting insufficient numbers of regular army and Russia's army supplemented with convicts, we're to understand that America's treasure is being handed to Ukraine's miraculous warriors who seem to be winning without the money and weapons Z is begging for.
In reality, the money Congress/Biden has been, and will be sent to NATO fiends who control the Ukraine's fighting from their NATO bunkers and European offices.
Last year a particular bombing was rumored to have successfully taken out NATO's leadership in a bunker there. Colonel Douglas MacGregor said long ago that the military command structure for the Ukraine is entirely NATO and all visible troops Ukrainian. He also noted that the US does send troops there indirectly. Our military are allowed to 'retire', serve in the Ukraine, and then be re-instated back into the military upon return. I do wonder if they receive some kind of promotion or pay bump for serving a stint in the proxy war. While they are in the Ukraine, they are called 'volunteers'.
Also, when the US provides complex missile systems to the Ukraine, they have to supply the operators, because such systems are completely dependent on highly skilled, trained operators.
So Lloyd Austen's fund-raising threat to send America's sons, daughters, brothers, uncles etc. to the Ukraine if Russia prevails is, naturally, deceptive as we already have Americans in country.
Therefore, today's revelation that NATO troops are serving in the Ukraine (missile support) comes as no surprise.
What tends to surprise me is that we are expected to believe the degree to which NATO supplies weapons, missiles, military command etc. (not to mention America's complete funding of Ukraine's pensions, salaries) are a sure sign the independent, fiesty Ukrainian armed forces are winning, if we just give them more money...
Wiretapped: Germany Again Appears to Reveal NATO Troops Active in Ukraine in Leak
Breitbart ^ | 03/04/2024 | OLIVER JJ LANE
Posted on 3/4/2024, 11:59:51 AM by ChicagoConservative27
Berlin has confirmed a leaked conversation between top military officers about the specifics of British soldiers assisting Ukraine in using advanced missiles took place.
A conversation that allegedly took place on March 1st involving a group of senior German officers including the head of Luftwaffe (Air Force) Generalleutnant Ingo Gerhartz [above, left] that took place on an open, unsecured line was intercepted by Russia and published over the weekend. Discussing options Germany had for deploying an advanced cruise missile against Russia in support of Ukraine with plausible deniability, one officer reflected in apparently prophetic words: “Just imagine the uproar if the media were to find out”.
Germany has since confirmed the conversation was real, but condemned Russia for using the conversation to try and “destabilise” Germany, and said it isn’t yet clear whether any elements of the conversation had been edited before it was publicly released by Moscow.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...