thanks. you piqued my curiosity.
I looked a little deeper.
“Overall, these findings, while evidencing a small benefit in symptom duration, do not support the use of ivermectin as treatment for COVID-19 in the community among a largely vaccinated population at the dose and duration we used,” the authors said.
“Overall, these findings, while evidencing a small benefit in symptom duration, do not support the use of ivermectin as treatment for COVID-19 in the community among a largely vaccinated population at the dose and duration we used,” the authors said." Further into the article a Dr.Kory,(not a study participant) took exception.
"He accused the authors of undertaking “statistical chicanery” by coming up with the pre-specified hazard ratio (HR), noting that no such level was used in other parts of the PRINCIPLE trial."The positive findings should also be interpreted in the context of recipients only receiving one dose per day across three days and being directed not to eat food before ivermectin, Dr. Kory said.
Dr. Butler and his co-authors said “no food should be taken two hours before or after administration” despite previous research finding that taking ivermectin with food increases plasma concentration.
Participants also received ivermectin a median of five days after symptom onset, a period of time considered by some to be too late to have much of an impact. Ivermectin works best when applied within 24 hours of symptom manifestation, according to a meta-regression of ivermectin studies. study was flawed as it was administered, (too little too late ?) but still showed ivermectin promise ?
another head scratcher ?
https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/people-who-received-ivermectin-were-better-off-study-finds-5601935?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=partner&src_cmp=vigilantf