I've been poking around the Q thread attic again.
I'm so grateful for all the digging/posting/meming y'all have done. The attic is rich with countless hours of your hard work, loaded with information the tech giants and MSM tried to erase.
I love touring the older wings of Foldy's art gallery, and the wit and beauty is still petal fresh.
I believe that Trump/Q always knew he would state he would neither concede nor leave office, and then they would stall, driving the Biden camp crazy and forcing them to develop alternative plans so that the Biden regime did not expect to access the outdoor area of the Capitol to make the swearing in look 'official'. Sure, the pics Scavino posted of Trump studying the portrait of Lincoln communicated the basis for their reasoning (let there be no Civil War) but I don't believe he was in a decision process, and instead was a) stalling and b) communicating the reasoning.
The Biden camp prepared to employ the strategy to 'take the election' as exposed (Twitter) online by @JohnHereToHelp. Note that the MSM was planning to deny all coverage to PJT. No social media, no MSM. Professional sound stages and sets - remember the tape 'marks' for Biden and Kamala to stand on to block out filming? Strange days indeed.
Here's Pelosi, telling the public that the Presidency is not a geography or a location, and that Biden would take office whethere Trump left or not.
Mika Brzezinski. – that it's easily faulted by people and, you know, can be corrupted in some way, even though most of the people in his Administration have voted by mail, including him. And, in the interview with Chris Wallace, he did not confirm whether he would leave – whether he would accept the results of the election if he lost. What do you make of that?
Speaker Pelosi. Well, that's a loaded question there about coronavirus, what we do about it. But the fact is, whether he knows it yet or not, he will be leaving. Just because he might not want to move out of the White House doesn't mean we won't have an inauguration ceremony to inaugurate a duly-elected President of the United States and the – I just – you know, I'm second in line to the Presidency. Just last week I had my regular continuation of government briefing. This might interest you because I say to them, ‘This is never going to happen. God-willing it never will.' But there is a process. It has nothing to do with the certain occupant of the White House doesn't feel like moving and has to be fumigated out of there because the presidency is the presidency. It's not geography or location.
SNIP
Mike Barnicle. Madam Speaker, you look great, as always.
I believe part of the interview was comms. Pelosi was indicating that if Joe's presidency was challenged, she refers to a process and says she's 'second in line to the presidency'.
Here's an image from an earlier post which I believe describes the alternative 'pressroom' being set up in Congressional chambers to pass for the real one. During President Trump's 7/23/2020 press conference, the whitehouse.gov live feed was briefly interupted with the live feed of an identical pressroom being set up. Network coverage did not have these feed interuptions. How they must have panicked when they saw Trump's White House feed showing the world what they were planning.
Very clever exposure - show the other pressroom live, being set up, in the middle of live coverage of the actual pressroom with President Trump.
How would we ever have known the difference if not for Q?
I do recall a social stir when Biden conducted an interview on a 'set' across the street from the White House, employing small versions of desks to accommodate the small location. They wanted the public to know it was a set. I think they were laying the groundwork to say the alternative locations were for National Security concerns and they tried to show the public but given the public's reaction, decided to use full scale sets.
I recall that Biden rushed to his 'inauguration' and was sworn in 13 minutes early on January 20th. I now realize that reports that he would be sworn in a day early were probably Biden's desparate attempt to lay hands on the nuke football and take office, so that anything Trump's administration could do to assert the rule of law would be framed as 'action taken against a sitting pResident'.
Below, I'm excerpting Thompson's thread to isolate the portion which says according to Biden's website and a Fox News schedule, Biden's 'inauguration' would take place at 'high noon' on Jan 19th. Perhaps Biden's website described the schedule for the President-elect(?) to provide the inaugural address. Perhaps they were expecting a legal fight and they wanted precedent (sworn in first) or?
Is FOX News Stupid or Has Biden Rescheduled His Faux Inauguration for Tuesday, January 19, 2021?
Lenora Thompson, Patriotic Writer ^ | 1/18/2021 | Lenora Thompson, Patriotic Writer
Posted on 1/18/2021, 11:37:40 AM by Lenora Thompson
Excerpted:
It very clearly states that "I Do Solemnly Swear: The U. S. Presidential Inauguration" is scheduled for high noon on Tuesday, January 19th.
That seems pretty clear, doesn't it? High Noon. Inauguration. What's one day, give or take, to a cheater like Biden!?! He cheats on everything else. Why not his fraudulent pantomime faux Inauguration Day as well!?!
Now scroll down to the schedule for Wednesday, January 20th and you'll find that every single event scheduled for January 20th is wishy-washy. All times still stated as "TBD." That includes the time for supposedly taking of the Oath of Office. What the...!?!
The idiocy even extends to stating that after taking the oath, the "President-ELECT" will then deliver "an inaugural address." Ummmmmm. Anyone else see anything wrong with that statement???
Also conspicuous by its absence is any mention of the name of the Justice administering the Oath of Office. Paging, John Roberts! Paging, John Roberts. Come in, John Roberts!
If I hadn't checked Discovery's site and confirmed they're broadcasting an "educational" show called "I Do Solemnly Swear: The U. S. Presidential Inauguration" on Tuesday, I would assume that Biden and his ilk want to keep us guessing. That they're being vague on purpose. That they may even be planning to treasonously speak the sacred words of the Oath of Office on Tuesday the 19th.
I see that some online have asked an impertinent question. The official answers on the Internet don't name names.
