Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ckilmer

Will the .fedgov have a proprietary interest in what the money for this fusion project creates? (If it creates anything?)

Sorry, but I’ve seen too much of these subsidy farmers to trust ‘em any farther than I can throw a Buick. Prohibit them from holding stock in the company and see how they squeal. It’s romantic to believe in the power of American innovation, but when public money comes into it the grim reality is that the only innovation is in the accounting department.


24 posted on 02/23/2024 11:31:36 AM PST by Chad C. Mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Chad C. Mulligan

I don’t disagree with your general point that there is a lot of waste fraud and abuse.

I have read about whole companies dedicated to feeding off federal research dollars— whose primary competency is their ability fill out the complicated applications for federal dollars...but whose actual output...is nothing to speak of.

I’ve read too that the best professors in the best universities spend much of their time applying for grants—so much so — that its usually their staff that does the actual work.

I don’t think that the fusion research and their researchers fall into any of these categories.

Its like that in any field. You have the real players, the up and coming, the wanna bes, the once weres, the never weres, the never will bes and the imposters.

imho the fusion researcher are the real players. You’re free to say only that only the thorium researchers are the real players. I think thorium researchers are real players too. If so, we probably agree that the light water reactors and the people who support them have gone past their sell by date. Its a shame most federal federal nuclear research dollars go to light water reactors. The light water smr’s set to come out after 2030 will be DOE dinasaurs in my opinion.

I don’t think that the current operating US big reactors should be shut down. That was a stupid move by the Germans. It would be a stupid move for the US.


25 posted on 02/23/2024 11:49:46 AM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Chad C. Mulligan

I don’t disagree with your general point that there is a lot of waste fraud and abuse.

I have read about whole companies dedicated to feeding off federal research dollars— whose primary competency is their ability fill out the complicated applications for federal dollars...but whose actual output...is nothing to speak of.

I’ve read too that the best professors in the best universities spend much of their time applying for grants—so much so — that its usually their staff that does the actual work.

I don’t think that the fusion research and their researchers fall into any of these categories.

Its like that in any field. You have the real players, the up and coming, the wanna bes, the once weres, the never weres, the never will bes and the imposters.

imho the fusion researcher are the real players. You’re free to say only that only the thorium researchers are the real players. I think thorium researchers are real players too. If so, we probably agree that the light water reactors and the people who support them have gone past their sell by date. Its a shame most federal federal nuclear research dollars go to light water reactors. The light water smr’s set to come out after 2030 will be DOE dinasaurs in my opinion.

I don’t think that the current operating US big reactors should be shut down. That was a stupid move by the Germans. It would be a stupid move for the US.


26 posted on 02/23/2024 11:49:48 AM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson