Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger
One has to wonder why the Antikythera Mechanism was not produced in numbers if it was genuinely useful. Was it commissioned as a one-of for a special client? Was it a prototype that was lost before its value could be fully assessed? Was the time and effort to produce it so great that it was essentially unaffordable? Or maybe it lacked genuine practical value.
8 posted on 02/18/2024 3:25:38 AM PST by Rockingham (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rockingham
One has to wonder why the Antikythera Mechanism was not produced in numbers if it was genuinely useful.

The idea of mass production was 2000 years in their future. EVERYTHING they made was hand-crafted. That thing probably took years to make. Consider how long it took John Harrison to make the first successful seagoing chronometer by hand.

Credit should have been given to Carl Zeiss IMT, who built the X-ray CAT scanner that enabled the researchers to see inside those corroded lumps and measure the parts so precisely.

9 posted on 02/18/2024 3:51:11 AM PST by Chad C. Mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson