Nowhere in what I wrote did I suggest that you had proof. I did suggest that some of the artifacts in your picture no longer existed - had been melted down for the gold and silver - thus there could be no 'proof' that they existed, other than the photographs - which mean little by themselves in archaeology.
I surmise that your 'evidence' has to do with 'haplogroups' - which is over my head, as I said. I asked you what 'artifacts' you refer to (as evidence). You can go to PM if you like and think we can communicate.