It’s definitely Turner Syndrome, or Jacob’s Syndrome, or Klinefelter Syndrome with degraded or maybe cross contaminated DNA.
Interesting. You made me look it up.
It’s odd that Turner Syndrome is described as a woman with a missing X chromosome, when it could just as easily be a man with a missing Y. Of course, the suffering person may well exhibit only female traits.
My complaint is that the technique described seems no where near as definitive as identifying intact cells in tissue with the malady. It sounds to me like what has been found could more easily be explained by other means, such as selective breakdown of whatever markers they are looking for.
Of course, if the findings are well within the norms of what currently exists, then it isn’t really saying much. But far outside the norm would lead me to question the methodology before the results.