Posted on 01/19/2024 10:44:07 PM PST by ransomnote
What letters of the alphabet correspond to the numbers in that picture?
10 = J
20 = T
Any 4’s in there?
4 = D
All together, 4 10 20 = D J T.
Here is a refresher on the Supremacy Clause, with is probably accurate citations, even if it is a quick and dirty grab off Wikipedia:
Wikipedia
Supremacy Clause
For the “Supremacy phrase”, see Henry VIII § Style and arms.
The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the “supreme Law of the Land”, and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws.[1] It provides that state courts are bound by, and state constitutions subordinate to, the supreme law.[2] However, federal statutes and treaties must be within the parameters of the Constitution;[3] that is, they must be pursuant to the federal government’s enumerated powers, and not violate other constitutional limits on federal power, such as the Bill of Rights—of particular interest is the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states that the federal government has only those powers that are delegated to it by the Constitution.
The Supremacy Clause is essentially a conflict-of-laws rule specifying that certain federal acts take priority over any state acts that conflict with federal law. Some jurists further argue that the clause also nullifies federal law that is in conflict with the Constitution, although this is disputed.[4] The Supremacy Clause follows Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation, the predecessor of the Constitution, which provided that “Every State shall abide by the determination of the [Congress], on all questions which by this confederation are submitted to them.”[5]
As a constitutional provision announcing the supremacy of federal law, the Supremacy Clause assumes the underlying priority of federal authority, albeit only when that authority is expressed in the Constitution itself;[6] no matter what the federal or state governments might wish to do, they must stay within the boundaries of the Constitution.[7] Consequently, the Supremacy Clause is considered a cornerstone of the United States’ federal political structure.[8][9]
~~~~
~~~~
“This Fight is Not Over” – Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton Vows to Defy Supreme Court Ruling on Razor Wire at Southern Border
By Cristina Laila Jan. 22, 2024
— GP
From BTT,
(and see my note at end *)
https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/4207046/posts?page=114#114
“
CW2 / Domestic violence - Heightened THREAT
Showdown in TX continues.
Our country is teetering on the edge of a new constitutional crisis.
Justices John Roberts and Amy Coney Barett, sided with the Biden administration, allowing Biden’s federal border agents to dismantle razor fencing set up by Texas agents to stop illegals immigrants entering America.
The vote was 5-4. The decision vacated a previous injunction from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that prevented federal agents from cutting the wire.
Both Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton will refuse to back down over the issue and will carry on fighting to secure the southern border from the waves of illegal immigration. How that continued fight manifests will be seen in the course of the next few days.
The case is ongoing in lower courts, the USSC decision overturns a restraining order prohibiting removal of fencing during the appeal processes.
Abbots and Paxton’s rebuke of the decision left inferences that border patrol may still have difficulties accessing TX installed barb wire fences. Some thoughts included they can cut it but will be denied access thru Texas console lands to get to it in order to cut it. Give the decision - there doesn’t appear any demand to permit BP to cross TX controlled lands. If TX uses that apparent loop hole, the potential for violence greatly increases at Eagle Pass, though there are other areas less secure.
Across the inter webs, the issue spread like wildfire in support of TX. Many look at this situation of one of the most severe cases of state vs fed powers since the civil war. Many are encouraging Abbot to prohibit access to the fence, with many other calls to go forward with the growing TEXIT movement to pull out of the union. As I noted before, this may stimulate other red states to become more aggressive in opposing the regime.
Border Patrol and other federal agents need to firmly be reminded that they are to support the constitution, and not a mad man bent on destroying this country via open borders. Choice time is coming quickly - who’s side are the going to be on.
Will Abbot refuse access? Today may be critical in the growing standoff.
“
*
Article mentions that court cases regarding the border are ongoing in the lower courts; maybe this is why AG Paxton said “temporary”; see except in my post here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4211604/posts?page=874#874
Elon Musk Says DIE — Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity — Sounds Like it Comes From an Orwell Book
RitaOK wrote:
“
Here is a refresher on the Supremacy Clause, with is probably accurate citations, even if it is a quick and dirty grab off Wikipedia:
...
“
Problem is, the feds aren’t even following their own laws.
And, there are still lower court cases going on about the border- this ruling by SCOTUS just addressed the removal of barriers during the appeal process.
I remain gobsmacked that anyone would give a damn about the NFL or any other "professional" football at this point in time. An utterly worthless, bread-and-circuses pile of steaming crap.
Once the PGA took the Western away, they had no rea$on to keep it to PGA $tandard$.
I haven’t done it but an old friend (priest) said using a pliers and pulling up while stepping on the tail is the only way.
Excellent!
Re skinning:
I have seen that on YouTube. Effective.
Lawyers are modern-day Pharisees and Sadducees.
God’s Commandments had the Talmud.
The US Constitution has the CFR.
#HumptyDumptyLawyers
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4212302/posts?page=1
Biden knows VP Harris ‘not up to the job,’ preferred Gretchen Whitmer as ‘20 running mate: book
nypost ^ | 1/22/2024 | Josh Christenson
Posted on 1/23/2024, 12:47:03 PM by bitt
President Biden knows full well Vice President Kamala Harris is “not up to the job” of commander-in-chief — and he preferred Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer as his running mate in 2020 before caving to public pressure, according to a new book out Tuesday.
Biden chose Harris days before that year’s virtual Democratic National Convention after promising to select a woman and after pro-Harris lobbying from former President Barack Obama, veteran Washington journalist Charlie Spiering writes in his book “Amateur Hour: Kamala Harris in the White House.”
Bob, I would send this privately, but others may find it useful.
I tried the CPap without distilled water/ any water and it is fine.
Less work, less concern about water, and less worry about germs. Thank you !
You and foldspace are MASTER MEME-MAKERS! Appreciate your gift.
Met Nick yesterday just before he left Palm Springs.
Dave at X22 posted a video that proposes Pence may have been a Whitehat all along who helped stop a coup at the hands of Nancy Pelosi and crew. Start at 28:25......
Report: Michelle Obama’s Secret Plan to Replace Joe Biden for President Emerges
GATEWAYPUNDIT ^ | 1/23/2024 | cullen linebarger
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4212307/posts?page=1
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.