Replies

The lunar module could not have accomplished its mission.
The technology did not exist at that time.

That is science.

Oh good grief. The self-appointed “experts” whose scribbling you cite are nobodies with resumes that read exactly like some similar “experts” I faced in court when I worked for the airport. I represented the airport as the client representative in a number of civil suits against the airport. Some involved homeowners who were making inverse condemnation claims due to aircraft overflights and aircraft noise. These homeowners were in several cases approached by self-proclaimed “experts” who they unfortunately hired. Much of the evidence in these cases involved highly technical acoustic science and the technical details of acoustic measurements. These guys put together very impressive sounding resumes, and in at least one case had legitimate credentials in certain aspects of acoustics, yet their expert reports and testimony on the stand were a combination of utter misunderstanding of the science specific to the case and a number of just bald-faced lies to cover up their ignorance. One of them was pontificating on the stand when our attorney just shredded him on cross examination. To the uninitiated layperson, and probably to the homeowner who hired him, he sounded highly knowledgeable, throwing out reams of impressive-looking charts and graphs, but in reality he was just spewing utter BS. It was so bad that even though we knew we had already won the case, our attorney kept drilling him on cross (at the risk of annoying the judge) because she just wanted to make sure that no one would be scammed by him again. He was a complete joke, yet I’ve seen him pop up since on a Discovery Channel UFO documentary, cited in that case as an “expert” on radar data (he is most certainly not that either - his real expertise was working on tape recorder technology for AGFA).

You have to be very careful who you trust online, especially self-appointed “experts” you’ve never heard of before and who have no reputable track record. As for the moon landing, just consider several well-known, globally-acknowledged, indisputable facts:

We have the testimonies of the twelve astronauts who walked on the moon, as well as six who remained in the command module, plus the Apollo 13 astronauts who didn’t land, but orbited the moon and those in the earlier missions that orbited as well. Of course, I know…they’re all just lying, right?

Then we have all of the moon rocks that were brought back and which have been examined and deemed authentic by laboratories around the world.

Apollo 11 left a laser reflector behind on the moon that is often used now to bounce lasers off the moon to measure its precise distance. That’s impossible without an artificial reflector placed on the surface.

The Lunar Reconnaissance orbiter has now taken photographs of the lunar module bases remaining at several of the Apollo landing sites as well as the rovers, their tracks, and even the trails of astronaut footprints.

It’s really ridiculous, frankly, that we’re even having this discussion.