The gas-lighters here all are just ignoring your repeated direct question to them. Because the truthful answer from this history of the constitutional convention as to WHY the “natural born Citizen” term is in the Presidential Elibility Clause defeats their gas-lighting arguments.
For those here that want to know the WHY the “natural born Citizen” term was put into the Presidential Eligibility Clause in our U.S. Constitution due to a letter from John Jay (who became the nation’s first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court) to George Washington (the President of the Constitutional Convention in the summer of 1787), that the Team Obama Obots and other Progressive Movement actors and social engineers here are unwilling to talk about, i.e., John Jay’s recommendation to George Washington in that letter, ... and directly answer to “A Strike”’s question of WHY, read: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/naturalborncitizen/TheWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyandHowofNBC-WhitePaper.pdf
Federalist #68 (Alexander Hamilton):
Nothing was more to be desired than that every practicable obstacle should be opposed to cabal, intrigue, and corruption. These most deadly adversaries of republican government might naturally have been expected to make their approaches from more than one querter, but chiefly from the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils. How could they better gratify this, than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union? But the convention have guarded against all danger of this sort, with the most provident and judicious attention.
-PJ