[Labyrinthos]

The data points are 2019 and earlier. When did the covid jab come out again?

[El Cid]

The data points are 2019 and earlier. When did the covid jab come out again?

We obviously will have to wait for more recent data to get published, although there have been a lot of claims about 'turbo-cancers' appearing after the implementation of the CoVid shots in 2020.
Notwithstanding, increasing the children's vaccine schedule from 12 shots/25 antigens in 1986 to 54 shots/70 antigens in 2019 is pretty extreme. Heck, even 12 shots sounds like a lot for a small child.
I'd like to see the cancer rates published for vaccinated vs unvaccinated. Or, 'mildly vaccinated' (e.g., just having received a few shots) vs 'fully vaccinated'. Too bad the CDC apparently doesn't have any interest in mining and publishing this data.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Aren’t you the spoilsport!?

[fr_freak]

The data points are 2019 and earlier.

I've been seeing a lot of articles lately that reference data for health trends from earlier than 2020. Why wouldn't an article written in 2024 include data from 2020-2023? 2019 was five years ago.

I strongly suspect it is a misdirection tactic. Print some article in 2024 with 2019 data regarding a mild uptick in cancer rates among the young so that, when the data comes out for the significant to massive upticks in cancer rates for the young in the last 3 years or so, people can say "Oh this has been going on long before COVID 'vaccines'!"

It also serves as a means by which to discredit those who suspect the "vaccines" as having high rates of adverse effects, a sort of "gotcha!" when it is pointed out that the data is pre-2020. "See? The data is 2019 and earlier - no reason to think the COVID 'vaccines' are bad - you're just a conspiracy theorist!"

There really isn't any other logical reason to be using 5-year-old data so often in current articles.

[hinckley buzzard]

Forget it. The vaxcrackers are immune to facts.