Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NY.SS-Bar9
JAL was flying/landing, so this was a “midair”.

Quote from an NHK news report:

"The Japan Coast Guard says the JAL plane collided with one of its aircraft immediately after landing at around 6 P.M. on Tuesday."

"Immediately after landing" doesn't suggest a midair collision to me.

32 posted on 01/02/2024 8:57:39 AM PST by plsvn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: plsvn

After seeing more photos and videos of the JAL Airbus 350-900 wreck, I wonder if JAL was still partially in the air when it hit the smaller Dash 8. The nose of the 350 is smashed in and the nose gear and the right landing gear are missing.


38 posted on 01/02/2024 9:17:43 AM PST by EVO X ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson