Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MtnClimber

Jack Smith is used to losing unanimously in the Supreme Court. Somehow he does not seem embarrassed about the prospect of another time.


2 posted on 12/29/2023 5:35:45 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MtnClimber

Jackboot Smith believes that he IS the law. I pray that he is sadly mistaken.


6 posted on 12/29/2023 5:48:42 PM PST by Shady (The Force of Liberty must prevail for the sake of our Children and Grandchildren...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

“Somehow he does not seem embarrassed about the prospect of another time.”

For Jack, the process is the punishment, Jack envisions a speedy and unobstructed trial via the oh-so compliant Judge Chutkan, and to get that conviction quickly, via and oh-so left leaning jury pool.

Once he gets his show-conviction, the damage is done, (in his mind), Trump loses the election before winning his appeal.

No Trump presidency, huge amounts spent in legal fees and courtroom clown shows permeating the election-cycle news cycle while Biden slobbers, child-sniffs and scuttles in for a 2nd term.

That’s the vision and goal Jack operates under. Dude is a world class punk.

If only he were granted his prosecutorial powers a couple years earlier!


8 posted on 12/29/2023 5:54:26 PM PST by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Time to revoke prosecutorial and judicial immunity.
What use is the 14th amendment if it’s not applied equally?


24 posted on 12/29/2023 7:40:23 PM PST by grumpygresh (Civil disobedience by non-compliance; jury and state nullification. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Smith continues his lawless ways because there are no consequences to his actions when he is wrong. Should a frivolous legal action be deemed so by a judge, make the prosecution pay for any and all financial obligations that were imposed upon a defendant. For example, if a guy had to sell his house to pay legal fees and then won the case, the prosecution is on the hook for the legal fees and for replacing the home. Where this becomes interesting is this: what if a member of the defendants family dies because of the stress induced by the legal action. Who on the losing prosecution is gonna volunteer to do a rope dance? Entertaining thought ...

Of course a financial settlement would probably be put in place, but the amount has to hurt the prosecution.


29 posted on 12/30/2023 5:19:27 AM PST by ByteMercenary (Cho Bi Dung and KamalHo are not my leaders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

“ Jack Smith is used to losing unanimously in the Supreme Court. Somehow he does not seem embarrassed about the prospect of another time.”

Jack is thinking about that payday down the road. One can only wonder what he’s been promised to stage this sham.


31 posted on 12/30/2023 6:29:08 AM PST by Rlsau1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson