As for "contradicting public health recommendations", which ones might those be?
The ones that claimed masks work despite Dr. Mengele Fauxi himself saying they don't?
The recommendation that you should listen to the psychopath Fauxi who claimed he was The ScienceTM?
The ones that claimed the arbitrary six feet of distancing would prevent the spread of the virus?
The ones that claimed COVID-1984 would spread in churches but not in liquor stores, smoke shops, or casinos?
The ones that claimed making store aisles one way would prevent the spread of the virus?
The ones that claimed you needed a mask to walk around but COVID-1984 was okay once you sat down?
The ones that claimed it was okay to march cheek to jowl for racist, anti-white demonstrations but not safe to gather with friends and family?
The ones that claimed it was okay to loot and riot under the guise of "protesting" but not safe to gather with friends and family?
The ones that claimed you should be locked down and given untested injections while millions of unvetted illegal aliens crossed the border?
The ones that said you needed to get untested injections to fly in a commercial airplane but COVID-1984 was not an issue in corporate jets?
Yeah, anyone who contradicted such deceitful "recommendations" is to be commended for sanity and reason. Anyone who issued or supports those "recommendations" is a criminal or a cultist.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “As for “contradicting public health recommendations”, which ones might those be?”
Instead of waving your arms about irrelevant issues, read the wikipedia article which identifies the fraudulent claims made by McCullough.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “Really, you’re going to cite Wikipedia? Did you post it to Wikipedia beforehand or did your eleven year old neighbor do it for you?”
Instead of waving your arms while making ad hominem attacks, read the wikipedia article which identifies the fraudulent claims made by McCullough.