Posted on 12/23/2023 1:15:16 PM PST by RandFan
@P_McCulloughMD
On MSM and independent media I cite the medical literature and source the data for verification so we have can a fair discussion of the emerging science. Accurate, consistent, no flip-flops. Never got this from government agencies or captured media commentators
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Actually, he lists the ingredients publicly.
You can buy them anywhere you want.
He’s not a snake oil salesman IN MY OPINION but he has to make a living.
Being a heretic is not easy.
They even tried to take away his license at the height of the pandemic
Remember?
The COVID-19 vaccine was not needed by healthy people under 50 or kids, as they had very little risk, as shown by accumulated deaths into June of this year:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1191568/reported-deaths-from-covid-by-age-us/
There wasn't provable asymptomatic spread of consequence, either, and the CDC’s own source, which just came out in February 2021, versus when Dr. McCullough said that in March 2021.
From the CDC’s meta study noted on their site:
Transmission
People who have asymptomatic or symptomatic infections can transmit SARS-CoV-2, with varying rates and timelines for transmission.(16)
Reference 16 that the CDC used from Feb. 2021:
Symptom Status of Index Case
From 18 studies [18, 19, 22, 27, 29–31, 33, 39, 40, 44, 45, 47, 49–53], SAR was lowest for asymptomatic index cases at 1.9% (95% CI: 0.5–3.1) (Figure 5) (asymptomatic definitions and follow-up durations for included studies shown in Supplementary Table 13).
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/73/3/e754/6131730?login=false
1.9% Secondary Infection Rate (SAR) was believed to occur from asymptomatic people, people who tested positive and got around other people. So out of every 100 asymptomatic people around others, less than 2 people were believed to ever get COVID.
This is anecdotal, but my own cousin died a couple days after getting his first shot. He was in the hospital a day later. He didn't have COVID when he got the shot, but allowing the doctors to say he died of COVID, instead of the shot, let the Federal government pay for his funeral. He actually died from the vaccine effects, and it was obvious.
I'd say there's nothing problematic with Peter, and even the group that was threatening to decertify him, the American Board of Internal Medicine, proudly shows he's still 100% fine:
https://www.abim.org/verify-physician?type=name&ln=mccullough&fn=peter
See post #42 below.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “As for “contradicting public health recommendations”, which ones might those be?”
Instead of waving your arms about irrelevant issues, read the wikipedia article which identifies the fraudulent claims made by McCullough.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “Really, you’re going to cite Wikipedia? Did you post it to Wikipedia beforehand or did your eleven year old neighbor do it for you?”
Instead of waving your arms while making ad hominem attacks, read the wikipedia article which identifies the fraudulent claims made by McCullough.
ConservativeMind wrote: “1.9% Secondary Infection Rate (SAR) was believed to occur from asymptomatic people, people who tested positive and got around other people. So out of every 100 asymptomatic people around others, less than 2 people were believed to ever get COVID.”
How does that invalidate the claims of asymptomatic infections?
Even Senator Johnson admits that McCullough has been stripped of his licenses.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “From your priest Albert Bourla himself:”
Bourla didn’t say the vaccines didn’t work.
“We know that the two doses of the vaccine offer very limited protection, if any,” Dr Bourla said.
“The three doses with a booster, they offer reasonable protection against hospitalisation and deaths – against deaths, I think, very good, and less protection against infection. Now we are working on a new version of our vaccine, the 1.1, let me put it that way, that will cover Omicron as well. Of course we are waiting to have the final results, [but] the vaccine will be ready in March.”
wgmalabama wrote: “All your sources are corrupted progressive filth. I will make assumptions based on how and from where you obtain your trusted data. You’re a snake, we know you’re a snake, you know you’re a snake so just slither away.”
Instead of refuting my sources, you make an ad hominem attack upon me.
What organization stripped him of those licenses?
American Board of Internal Medicine
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23242430-abim-decision-on-mccullough
His licenses were never stripped. All you gave me was evidence they once considered such a stupid thing.
They closed the case and apologized.
He is fully certified by that very organization, with no problems, whatsoever:
https://www.abim.org/verify-physician?type=name&ln=mccullough&fn=peter
ConservativeMind wrote: “His licenses were never stripped. All you gave me was evidence they once considered such a stupid thing.”
How do you explain the fact that McCullough himself admits his certifications were ‘stripped’?
“Dr. Peter McCullough: “Yesterday I was stripped of my board certifications in Internal Medicine and Cardiology after decades of perfect clinical performance, board scores, and hundreds of peer reviewed publications. None of this will stop until there is a needle in every arm.””
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/yhm2kc/dr_peter_mccullough_yesterday_i_was_stripped_of/
It never completed. They threatened to do so, but later dropped it.
He never lost his license or certifications. It’s right there, today, as you can see.
ConservativeMind wrote: “It never completed. They threatened to do so, but later dropped it. He never lost his license or certifications. It’s right there, today, as you can see.”
As you can see, McCullough himself admits he was stripped of his certification:
“Dr. Peter McCullough: “Yesterday I was stripped of my board certifications in Internal Medicine and Cardiology after decades of perfect clinical performance, board scores, and hundreds of peer reviewed publications. None of this will stop until there is a needle in every arm.””
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/yhm2kc/dr_peter_mccullough_yesterday_i_was_stripped_of/
He got them back, then. He’s 100% vindicated.
Or, your website is out of date.
Then he’s still not vindicated.
I guess they're paying you to post until at least the end of the year.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “So... to you “limited protection, if any” is equal to “it works”.”
Read again what Bourla said. You’re misquoting him.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “I guess they’re paying you to post until at least the end of the year.”
Considering your history of misquotations, you must be auditioning for a job at Harvard.
The guy’s still lying about “Covid”—and has a massive conflict of interest with his Wellness gig. But that he’s now about trying to talk us out of an illegal immigration invasion (to help the Dems in 2024, presumably) just confirms that he’s a controlled operative.
Sorry.
McCullough says differently.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.