Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: reasonisfaith

“Right. Including your belief that spirituality is emotion.”

Nice try. There is not much rationality in spirituality. Indeed, the two are pretty much contradictory. Thus, the driving force behind spirituality must necessarily be emotional in nature.

That is not meant as a criticism of spirituality.

But, I don’t expect you to understand that.


164 posted on 12/24/2023 9:51:45 AM PST by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: ought-six; grey_whiskers

(Grey Whiskers, you don’t need to participate, this is just a ping.)

Oughtsix, I don’t mean to make you uncomfortable in bringing the focus to your own beliefs.

Your own beliefs include the one telling you spirituality is emotional.

That is to say, you believe spirituality is a function of emotion, or e = f(s).

But my point here is that your belief is itself a function of emotion, otherwise stated as f[f(s) = e] = E.


165 posted on 12/25/2023 2:50:16 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson