The headline is worded a bit confusingly. Going by wording, it implies that men have a 20$ higher mortality after the first injection, but that with each subsequent injection that mortality risk declines i.e. the risk drops. However, the article seems to be saying that each subsequent injection exacerbates the mortality risk (which would make sense).
However, the article seems to be saying that each subsequent injection exacerbates the mortality risk (which would make sense).
~~~
Yes, Very poorly written.
I think you might be interpretting it right.
20% risk from the first one, but (as an example) and 15% risk is suffered from the second one. Then perhaps a %10 risk from the third. In other words, your risk doesn’t go down, its just that each booster offers some risk but not as much as the first shot.
“The headline is worded a bit confusingly.”
LOL! Ya THINK?
Thank you. I found it most confusing also.
Effect #2: I’ll show you that when deaths are DECLINING in New Zealand, if you got one of those COVID shots, your death rate INCREASES over time. You are basically increasing your chances of dying with additional shots [...]
I agree with the others here: The title is very poorly worded.
Regards,